Laserfiche WebLink
RESOLUTION NO. 17-10 <br />A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF <br />REDWOOD CITY DENYING THE APPEAL OF ROBERT E. GRAHAM <br />AND UPHOLDING THE DECISION OF THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR <br />APPROVING ARCHITECTURAL PERMIT NO. AP2017-034 FOR 3839 <br />HARVEST DRIVE <br />WHEREAS, the Kastrop Group on behalf of Kate and John Pandes (Applicant), <br />filed an application for an Architectural Permit to allow construction of a new second - <br />story addition (the Project) for the property located at 3839 Harvest Drive, Redwood <br />City, California (the Property); and <br />WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 45.3 of the Zoning Ordinance, the Zoning <br />Administrator is authorized to review and approve such Architectural Permits; and <br />WHEREAS, on May 19, 2017, the Zoning Administrator issued a Notice of <br />Official Action for Architectural Permit No. AP2017-034, approving the Project because <br />the required R-1 Zoning District standards were met and the Architectural Permit <br />findings were made; and <br />WHEREAS, on June 1, 2017, an appeal of the Zoning Administrator's decision to <br />approve the Architectural Permit was filed with the City Clerk by Robert E. Graham <br />(Appellant) ; and <br />WHEREAS, on August 4, 2017, a public hearing notice was published in the <br />San Mateo Daily Journal and mailed to interested parties and all property owners within <br />300 feet of the Property; and <br />WHEREAS, on August 15, 2017, the Planning Commission of the City of <br />Redwood City held a duly noticed public hearing in accordance with all applicable <br />requirements of the State Planning and Zoning Law and the Redwood City Zoning <br />Ordinance, to consider the appeal; and <br />WHEREAS, on August 15, 2017, the Appellant, the Applicant and all other <br />interested parties were given the opportunity to participate in the public hearing through <br />oral testimony and the submittal of written comments; and <br />WHEREAS, on August 15, 2017, the Planning Commission fully reviewed, <br />considered, and evaluated the staff reports prepared for the Project including the <br />attachments to the staff reports, oral and written public testimony, and all other <br />documents and evidence in the public record on the Project and the appeal. <br />ATTY/RESO.0079/PC RESO DENYING APPEAL 3839 HARVEST DRIVE <br />REV: 08-17-17 PR <br />Page 1 of 4 <br />