My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2014-09-08 Closed and Joint with SA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
AgdaPkt 2014-09-08 Closed and Joint with SA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/15/2014 9:41:52 AM
Creation date
9/4/2014 6:52:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency
Date
9/8/2014
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
329
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
B PCompatibilitIFactorsf EvaluatedtinnALUCPst <br /> 9.A. - Page 129 <br /> B.2.2 Sample Noise Policies <br /> The following are sample noise policies from the 2011 Handbook: <br /> Policy 1: New land use development shall be restricted in accordance with the following criteria. <br /> of New residential uses shall be considered incompatible within the CNEL contour <br /> determined by the ALUC. <br /> bf New nonresidential uses shall be considered incompatible in locations where the airport- <br /> related noise exposure would be highly disruptive to the specific land use. <br /> Policy 2: Land uses for which interior activities may be easily disrupted by noise shall be required <br /> to comply with the following interior noise level criteria. <br /> of For residential uses, CNEL 45 dB in any habitable room of single-or multi-family <br /> residences. <br /> bf For nonresidential uses, 50 dB in: <br /> 1! Offices; <br /> 2! Restaurants; and <br /> 3.f Retail stores. <br /> B.Mafetyv <br /> B.3.1 Safety Policy Foundations <br /> In order for ALUCs and local land use jurisdictions to address the preceding compatibility <br /> concerns, an assessment of safety standards and guidelines set by federal and state agencies is <br /> essential. Unlike the case with noise,though, few federal and state laws,regulations, or policies <br /> address the issue of safety-related land use compatibility around airports. This section <br /> summarizes significant criteria which federal and state agencies have developed. <br /> FederalS6tatuteslandhRegulationsv <br /> The following federal regulations and statutes are the most influential from the standpoint of land <br /> use compatibility planning for safety. <br /> Federal Aviation Administration <br /> Land use safety compatibility guidance from the FAA is limited to the immediate vicinity of the <br /> runway,the runway protection zones at each end of the runway, and the protection of navigable <br /> airspace. The absence of FAA land use compatibility criteria for other portions of the airport <br /> environment is often cited by land use development sponsors as an argument that further controls <br /> on land use are unnecessary. What must be remembered,however, is that the FAA criteria apply <br /> SanfCarlosfAirportV B-6 ESAfAirportsf/130753f <br /> ALUCPf W hitef Pape/ Junef2014f <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.