My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2014-10-20 Closed and Special Joint with SA_Revised_10_17_2014
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
AgdaPkt 2014-10-20 Closed and Special Joint with SA_Revised_10_17_2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/13/2014 2:13:26 PM
Creation date
10/16/2014 4:39:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency
Date
10/20/2014
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
294
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
8.A. - Page 126 <br /> o Redwood City should include a program to preserve mobile home parks <br /> as a source of affordable housing. While Redwood City's Zoning Code <br /> does include a mobile home park category (MH), only two of Redwood <br /> City's nine mobile home and/or RV parks appear to be zoned MH. <br /> (https://www.google.com/maps/@37.4871165,-122.1914132,17z). <br /> Further, Redwood City does not have a mobile home rent control <br /> ordinance, nor does it have a mobile home park conversion ordinance. <br /> The housing element should include a program to consider such policies, <br /> as well as a no- net -loss policy for mobile home park lands, as part of its <br /> obligation to conserve and improve the existing housing stock. <br /> o Redwood City should consider rent stabilization and just cause eviction <br /> protections to prevent the displacement of low- and moderate - income <br /> renters due to rising rents. <br /> o Redwood City should consider an ordinance prohibiting discrimination <br /> against Section 8 voucher- holders. The draft housing element notes <br /> Section 8 as an important affordable housing resource (H -51, H123) but <br /> does not discuss the widespread problem of discrimination against Section <br /> 8 voucher - holders. (See HCD, Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing <br /> (2012), p. 13 -2 <br /> <http: / /www.hcd.ca.gov/hpd/hrc /rep /fed/state_of_ca_ analysis_ of impedi <br /> ments_full %20report0912.pdf >.) Redwood City should set forth a <br /> program to consider local protections for Section 8 voucher - holders; such <br /> ordinances already exist in East Palo Alto and San Francisco. <br /> Conclusion <br /> Thank you for considering these comments. We look forward to discussing them and <br /> responding to any questions you may have when we talk on the phone tomorrow. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> /s/ <br /> Melissa A. Morris <br /> Senior Attorney <br /> cc: Diana O'Dell, Senior Planner, Redwood City <br /> Josh Hugg, Tracy Choi, and Diana Reddy, Housing Leadership Council <br /> Pilar Lorenzana- Campo, NPH <br /> David Zisser, Public Advocates <br /> 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.