Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1À.\\J <br />Legislative Bill Action <br />............................................................... <br />emergency r!!sponse situations. Currently, exis ing law Currently, th~ state's reimbursement payments <br />provides that any person who is under the influence of for boo,'ing fees reflect cities' 1997-98 costs. <br />an alcoholic bevel'£qe or any drug, whose negligent However, some cities now pay higher booking fees <br />operation of a motor vehicle, a boat or vessel, or a civil while othel cities pay nothing, and state fiscal relief <br />aircraft, causes any incident resulting in an appropriate to cities that pay booking fees should be tied to the <br />emergency response, that person is liable for the cities' actual costs. S8 1808 recalibrates the basis <br />expense of an emergency response by a public agency for reimbursement to reflect the 2002-03 booking <br />to the incident. fees. Staff: Dwight Stenbakken; Status: <br /> SenApps; Position: Support. <br />S8 1698 defines "emergency response" to mean <br />either of the following: 1) an enforcement stop by a law SB 1866 (Aanestad). Peace Officer Motor <br />enforcement agency utilizing emergency lights or sirens Vehicle Pursuit. S8 1866 will reduce the immu- <br />or both; 2) a fire, medical, or law enforcement response nity currently afforded law enforcement agencies in <br />to a vehicle collision, medical emergency, or other civil actions based on injuries that result from <br />incident requiring immediate assistance; and, 3) provid- vehicular pursuits of criminals. SB 1866 also <br />ing traffic control on a public roadway, or to ensure provides that in a civil action for damages for <br />safety on a navigable waterway. personal injury or death, the immunity would apply <br /> only it: 1) the law enforcement agency adopts and <br />S8 1698 will make our ::ommunities safer by enforc- implements a written policy on vehicle pursuits in <br />ing stiffer penaities for negligent offenders, holding them conformity with the new required pursuit policy <br />accountable for irresponsible actions. SB 1698 provides provisions created by the bill; 2) the pursuit was <br />a common sense interpretation and approach to emer- initiated, engaged in, or terminated by a peace <br />gency response situations and related cost recovery. officer acting within the scope of his or her employ- <br />Staff: Natasha Fooman; Status: Failed in SenPubSfty; ment whose action was not performed in bad faith <br />Position: Support. or in a grossly negligent manner; and 3) the peace <br /> officer complies with the strict new policy guidelines <br />SB 1808 (Committee on Local Gov.) Booking set forth in the bill. <br />Fees. Existing law authorizes a county to impose, <br />among other fees with respect to criminal justice ser- Officers in pursuit are forced to make split <br />vices, a booking fee upon other local agencies for second, often life and death decisions, To suggest <br />county costs incurred in processing or booking persons that a high-speed pursuit, with lives on the line will <br />arrested by employees of those entities, and brought to always go "by the exact letter of the book," is to <br />county facilities for booking and detention, misunderstand the nature of how fluid these <br /> dangerous situations are, <br />Existing law continuously appropriates up to <br />$50,000,000 annually from the General Fund to the S8 1866 will not stop injuries from occurring, <br />Controller commencing with the 1999-2000 fiscal year but it will ensure that taxpayers foot the bill for a <br />for allocation to cities and qualified special districts for criminal's decision to run from law enforcement. <br />actual booking and processing costs paid to the coun- Strengthening penaities for fleeing from a peace <br />ties, SB 1808 would specify that for the 2004-05 fiscal officer will have greater impact on reducing the <br />year, the appropriation shall be allocated to cities and likelihood of suspects who flee, Thank you for your <br />qualified special districts for reimbursement for actual attention to our concems. Staff: Natasha <br />costs incurred during the period of July 1, 2002, to July Fooman; Status: AsmJud; Position: Oppose. <br />1, 2003, This bill would require the Controller to allocate <br />those funds no later than December 1, 2004, 58 1808 <br />also sunsets the entire booking fee reimbursement <br />program on January 1, 2007, <br />Visit the League's Official Web Site--www.cacities.org <br /> PRIORITY FOCUS/PAGE 10 <br />