PRC MIN 1976-09-08 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

' , , /�w,, ' � �� `�r� Mr. Riback then answered questions from the Commission and members of the various Committees present. Mr. Cunningham of the Bao�u of Build�ng Review inquired as to whether the. dollar parameters established in the c!raft code were standardized dollar figures which were included in the Political Reform Act. H9r. F:iback indicated that they were. Commissioner Weintraub asked whether financial interest included those which were owned solely by �.ne'� spouse. ��: Riback indicated they did. P1r. Cunning��am asked for fu��c,�er clarification of the concept of personal material effect versus effect on the general public. htr. Riback complied with this request. He further � answered additional questions related to the definitions and dollar para- maters of personal income; subject jurisdictions for financial interest disclosures; the amount of time that an individual 's clisclosures will remain public record; and the time of filing for persons who are applying for appoint- ments to Boards and Commissions. Commissioner Rollins expressed concern with respect to the effect his status as a real estate broker would have on his disclosure reqwirements, indicating that most real estate sales involve a brokerage fee in excess of $1 ,000. He inquired as to whether the code was or was not demanding that he list every transaction. He further indicated that he had a fiduciary responsibilzty and obligation to his client which would prevent hii�� from revealing broker- age fees. �1r. Rib�ck acknowledged that the code appeared to require Mr. Rollins to list every real estate transaction with a brokerage fee in excess of $1 ,000. �9r. Gyselbrecht stated that he had prepared a draft copy of the code in addi- tion to disclosure catagories and that he hoped to have a special meeting with the Board of Building Review and the Housing Loan Comnittee to discuss any problems that might arise with respect to those cl;sclosure catagories. He further stated that he thought of other departments would be holding similar meetings. Chairperson Pound inquired as to aihetMer any such meet- ing had been intended for the Parks and Recreation Corrnission. Mr. Ferrando responded that due to F1r. t+leek's vacation schedule, the draft code and exhi- bits had been prepared prior to his leaving. He further indicated that if any real problems existed, that there would be time between the public hear- ing and the codes adoption by Council for individual members to meet with Mr. Weeks to discuss the disclosure catagories. ' Chairperson Pound thanked Mr. Riback for attending the meeting and provid- ing valuable information witli respect to this subject. REPORTS REPORT ITEM l . �epartmental ��ionthly Reports In regard to the Senior Center Architectural Studies, ��1r. Paulson indicated that there would be a joint meeting of the City Council , Parks and Recrea- tion Commission and the Senior Center Study Committee to receive the pre- sentation and final report of architectural consultant, Kingsford Jones. Chairperson Pound informed the members of the Commission that the date for that joint meeting was set for Wednesday, October 27 at 7:30 p.m. -4-