Laserfiche WebLink
<br />II , . I ,. - <br /> .J [ <br />that would otherwise have to be met from potable water sources. The recycled water system is <br />described in an engineering feasibility report previously reviewed and accepted by the City <br />Council: Water Recycling Feasibility Study for Redwood City, by Kennedy Jenks Consultants, <br />August 7,2002. Attachment 'E' includes excerpts from the executive summary of the August 7, <br />2002 final report, presenting the consultant's recommended project, estimated project costs, <br />implementation strategy and schedule for implementation. The recommended project would, at <br />full utilization, deliver up to 2,000 AFIY by 2010, thereby reducing demand on the San <br />Francisco regional water system. <br />On August 11, 2003 the City Council approved a broadly-defined recycled water project and <br />directed the City Clerk to file a Notice of Determination with the County Clerk and the State of <br />California. Attachment 'F' includes the staff report and Resolution No. 14547 from the August <br />11 Council meeting. <br />Permits, entitlements and approvals required in order to acquire/develop additional water <br />supplies via a recycled water project include: <br />. Regional Water Quality Control Board approval of Water Reuse Program Technical <br /> Report under General Order 96-011. The SBSA has secured approval. <br />. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) clearance. The Redwood City Planning <br /> Commission certified the Mitigated Negative Declaration on August 6, 2002. <br />. Contribution Agreement No. 4-1933-C, entered into on June 6, 2002, by and between <br /> the City of Redwood City and the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). <br /> The agreement establishes each party's responsibilities for the construction of a 24-inch <br /> recycled water transmission line within the Highway 101 right-of-way. <br />. City Council approval of project. (see Attachment 'F') <br />. State of California Department of Health Services Title 22 approval of Engineer's Report <br /> for operation of a recycled water distribution system. Preliminary work on this task is <br /> now underway. <br />In addition to the recycled water project, the Public Works Services Department has developed <br />additional water conservation measures ("best management practices" or "BMP's") that were <br />considered and approved by the City Council in June 2003. The amendments to the City's <br />Urban Water Management Plan reflect these specific, "active" or "aggressive" water <br />conservation policies of the City Council. Conservation has been identified as: <br />. A way to increase supply reliability for existing customers <br />. A method for accelerating "passive" conservation projections to "active" - i.e.: forcing <br /> more rapid replacement of inefficient water fixtures and appliances <br />Other possible sources of water supply which will be investigated include: <br />. Transfers of water entitlements and/or banked water from other agencies that are also <br /> members of the Bay Area Water Supply & Conservation Agency (BAWSCA). BAWSCA <br /> represents the interests of 26 cities and water districts, and two private utilities, that <br /> purchase water wholesale from the San Francisco regional water system. The entities <br /> provide water to 1.7 million people, businesses and community organizations in <br /> Alameda, Santa Clara and San Mateo counties. The Interim Water Shortage Allocation <br /> Plan (IWSAP) adopted by all BAWSCA agencies and SFPUC provides for voluntary <br /> transfers of water among BAWSCA agencies during periods when mandatory rationing <br /> is in effect on the San Francisco regional water system. Some BAWSCA agencies have <br /> the capacity to draw more heavily on local groundwater during dry years and thus may <br /> be willing to agree to transfer some portion of their San Francisco entitlement to other <br /> BAWSCA agencies willing to pay for this back up supply. This is a possible source of <br /> relief from rationing at levels more severe than those required in neighboring <br /> communities. Initial inquiries by the City of other agencies have not produced any <br /> Page 7 of 8 <br />