CC Min 2004-04-12 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

ORDINANCE APPROPRIATING SPECIFIED AMOUNTS FROM DESIGNATED UNAPPROPRIATED FUND BALANCES TO SPECIFIED APPROPRIATIONS, CANCELING CERTAIN APPROPRIATIONS, AND TRANSFERRING SPECIFIED AMOUNTS FROM DESIGNATED APPROPRIATIONS TO OTHER SPECIFIED APPROPRIATIONS The motion passed by a unanimous roll call vote. MINUTE ORDER 04 -60 D. Community Input Process for Fiscal Year 04 -05 Budget Parks, Recreation and Community Services Director /Assistant City Manager Centeno explained that although the City Council conducts study sessions in June where public comment is received, staff wishes to build on the Community Builders (CB) and PACT experience. A series of two meetings would occur, the first meeting to be with former CB and PACT participants due to the unique perspective of the City after the education received about departments and the City. The forum would be based on education, materials that Council will receive and discussion around the topic based on techniques learned in the programs. Input will be encouraged around both expenditures cuts and possible revenue increases. The second meeting would be held with the general public with the same process being used with a report from staff to Council prior to budget deliberations. Recommendation M/S Hartnett/Ruskin to accept the plan developed for community input into the Fiscal Year 04 -05 General Fund Budget. The motion passed by a unanimous voice vote. MINUTE ORDER 04 -61 8. MATTERS OF COUNCIL INTEREST A. Legislation (information only) - This sub - section involves possible discussion of City Position on Proposed Legislation described in the League of California Cities Priority Focus Bulletin Nos. 11 -2004, 12 -2004 and 13 -2004. Council may direct staff to act on positions taken by Council. (Copies of League of California Cities Priority Focus available in City Clerk's Department.) B. Staff response to Recycled Water Task Force recommendation - Retail /Cinema project recycled water dual plumbing Civil Engineer Chang stated that there are several reasons that the dual plumbing concept cannot be implemented with the Retail /Cinema project. The City does not have an ordinance in place requiring this action; the City cannot pay for the costs of dual plumbing without having a program available to other new commercial buildings; and the developer's plans are 95% completed. The most critical concern with the proposal is that the dual plumbing plans would need review and approval REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 12, 2004 MINUTES PAGE 8 MINUTES Book No. 60 Page No. 183