My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Reso PC15-01 PC Reso (3051 ) to Adopt Initial Study-Mitigated Negative Declaration - La Palma
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Planning Commission
>
2015
>
Reso PC15-01 PC Reso (3051 ) to Adopt Initial Study-Mitigated Negative Declaration - La Palma
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2015 9:44:00 AM
Creation date
2/23/2015 9:34:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
Planning Commission
Date
2/3/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
101
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED <br /> 2.1 INTRODUCTION <br /> This IS includes an evaluation of impacts based on the CEQA Guidelines Appendix G <br /> Environmental Checklist. Each checklist item is explained in the discussion following the <br /> checklist and,if necessary, mitigation measures are provided to reduce impacts to a less-than- <br /> significant level.In accordance with CEQA, all answers take into account the whole of the <br /> action, including on- and off-site effects, direct and indirect effects, and effects from both <br /> construction and operation of any new development. <br /> Each checklist criterion is marked to identify whether there is an environmental impact. <br /> • No impact indicates that there is no impact. <br /> • Less-than-significant impact means that while there is some impact,the impact is below the <br /> threshold of significance adopted by the City of Redwood City,or that measures required <br /> by law will reduce these impacts to a less-than-significant level. <br /> • Potentially significant unless mitigation incorporated indicates that a potentially significant or <br /> significant impact has been identified in the course of this analysis and mitigation <br /> measures have been provided in this IS to reduce the impact to a less-than-significant level. <br /> • Cumulative impacts are discussed in Section 3.18, Mandatory Findings of Significance, of this <br /> IS. The project is considered in combination with the projected build out of the City's <br /> General Plan to determine if any cumulative impacts are significant. If a significant <br /> cumulative impact is identified, the project's contribution to the significant cumulative <br /> impact is considered. <br /> The environmental factors checked below would be affected by the project,involving at least <br /> one impact that is potentially significant, as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. <br /> Mitigation measures have been provided for each potentially significant impact,reducing all <br /> impacts to a less-than-significant level. <br /> NAesthetics n Agriculture and Forestry Air Quality <br /> Resources <br /> ® Biological Resources P Cultural Resources N Geology and Soils <br /> n Greenhouse Gas 17 Hazards and Hazardous Hydrology and Water <br /> Emissions Materials v N Quality <br /> n Land Use and Planning Mineral Resources Noise <br /> n Population and Housing n Public Services n Recreation <br /> Transportation and no Utilities and Service ❑ Mandatory Findings of <br /> Traffic Systems Significance <br /> La Palma Subdivision Project <br /> Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration <br /> 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.