My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Reso PC15-01 PC Reso (3051 ) to Adopt Initial Study-Mitigated Negative Declaration - La Palma
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Planning Commission
>
2015
>
Reso PC15-01 PC Reso (3051 ) to Adopt Initial Study-Mitigated Negative Declaration - La Palma
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2015 9:44:00 AM
Creation date
2/23/2015 9:34:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
Planning Commission
Date
2/3/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
101
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
3.0 Environmental Impact Checklist <br /> Priolo fault zone for the San Andreas Fault and would not expose people or buildings to risks of <br /> fault rupture. <br /> a.ii)Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects,including the risk of <br /> loss,injury, or death involving strong seismic ground-shaking? <br /> Less-than-Significant Impact. While the project is not within an EFZ,the San Francisco Bay <br /> Area region has several known seismically active faults,making the region subject to strong <br /> ground-shaking in the event of an earthquake. Earthquakes along several nearby active faults in <br /> the region could cause moderate to strong ground shaking at the project site.The intensity of <br /> the earthquake ground motions and the damage done by them would depend on the <br /> characteristics of the generating fault, distance to the fault and rupture zone, earthquake <br /> magnitude, earthquake duration, and site-specific geologic conditions.Given that the entire San <br /> Francisco Bay Area region is subject to strong seismic ground shaking during a large <br /> earthquake event, the project would not expose people or structures to any greater risks <br /> involving seismic ground shaking than would other development located in the region. <br /> While the potential for seismic ground shaking cannot be eliminated,the project structures <br /> would be required to comply with the 2013 California Building Code(CBC) and other <br /> applicable standards and practices for earthquake resistant construction. Compliance with these <br /> standards and practices reduces the risks associated with strong seismic ground-shaking at the <br /> project site. Therefore, impacts related to seismic ground-shaking would be less than significant. <br /> a.iii)Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects,including the risk of <br /> loss,injury, or death involving seismic-related ground failure,including liquefaction? <br /> No Impact. Liquefaction is a phenomenon in which saturated soils lose their strength and <br /> stiffness as a result of seismic-related ground shaking. When liquefaction occurs, the ground <br /> behaves like a liquid,instead of a solid, causing the ground to sink or even pull apart.The <br /> project site is located in a general area of moderate liquefaction susceptibility as designated by <br /> the Association of Bay Area Governments(ABAG) (ABAG 2014a). The Geotechnical <br /> Investigation and Pavement Design Report(Appendix C)prepared for the project analyzed <br /> exploratory soils borings to determine whether potentially liquefiable soils were present <br /> underlying the project site.The results concluded that there are no liquefiable soils layers at the <br /> depths present underlying the project site.Thus, implementation of the project would not <br /> expose people or structures to risks from liquefaction. <br /> a.iv) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects,including the risk of <br /> loss,injury, or death involving landslides? <br /> No Impact.Landslides are related to instabilities in slopes and can be induced by earthquakes <br /> or heavy amounts of rainfall.Implementation of the project would not pose risks from <br /> landslides on-or off-site as the project site and its surroundings are relatively flat. There are no <br /> steep slopes or hillsides on the project site that would be susceptible to landslides. <br /> Implementation of the project would not expose people or structures to risks from landslides <br /> on-or off-site. <br /> La Palma Subdivision Project <br /> Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration <br /> 33 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.