Laserfiche WebLink
s o r r _ <br /> 410 <br /> 1 <br /> s � <br /> In response to question, City Clerk Hildebrand advised <br /> that the Affidavit of Publication of Notice of Hearing <br /> is on file in her office and that no written communica- <br /> tions have been received. <br /> Planning Director Schroeter described the proposed amend- <br /> aft <br /> ments to the Zoning Ordinance, observing that they include <br /> corrections in words and in sequence, and refer particu- <br /> larly to rear yards and to the planned design permit <br /> section with regard to elimination of a bonus plan which <br /> had never been implemented. <br /> Mayor Weymouth evwishedntonspeaksonttheosubject proposed <br /> to so. <br /> o do so. No one sed <br /> t <br /> amendments. <br /> MOTION: Councilman Norris moved, seconded by Councilman <br /> Leipzig, to close the public hearing. <br /> The motion carried unanimously by voice vote . <br /> The public hearing was closed at 7 :44 p.m. <br /> MOTION : Title having been read, Councilman Williams <br /> introduced the following ordinance and moved, seconded <br /> by Councilman Leipzig, its approval for first reading: <br /> ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 3 .1, 5.8, 6.8 7.8, 8.8, <br /> 9.8, io.8, 32 .5, 32.7, 41.3, 41.4, 41.7, 41.8, 42.3 <br /> 43.3 , 43.7, 45.9, AND 46.7 OF, ADDING SECTIONS 32.16 .•. <br /> AND 32.17 TO, AND REPEALING SECTIONS 1.8 AND 1.9 OF, <br /> ORDINANCE NO. 1130, THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY <br /> OF REDWOOD CITY, RELATING TO ELIMINATION OF UNUSED <br /> DESIGNATIONS, LOT COVERAGE IN R-1, R-2, R-3, <br /> R-4 AND R-5 DISTRICTS, FRONT AND SIDE YARD MODIFICA- <br /> TIONS, AMENDMENTS, USE PERMITS, VARIANCES, <br /> ARCHITECTURAL PERMITS, AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMITS <br /> The ordinance was approved unanimously by voice vote. <br /> Legislative Committee Report No. 75-2 <br /> Councilman Henderson, Chairman of the Legislative Commit- <br /> tee, read Report No. 75-2 and invited question of other <br /> Committee members and staff. <br /> In response to question regarding AB 1674 which would ex- <br /> pand the list of officials who may be furnished criminal <br /> history records, City Attorney Schricker advised that for <br /> some inexplicable reason the list of specified officials <br /> in the Penal Code does not include city attorneys with <br /> prosecutorial functions, city managers or personnel offi- <br /> cers who may reasonably require such information in con- <br /> nection with the conduct of their duties. Presumably <br /> those officials were left out of the recent "Crown Act" <br /> by oversight and should be included. ,dr <br /> t - <br /> City Manager Pales also commented on the need of city <br /> managers for such records, noting that they are required <br /> to be confidential in any case; may not be used for <br /> -2- <br /> Reg.Mtg. <br /> 6/2/75 <br />