CC MIN 1975 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

142 i P when a full Council could be present Mr. Fales advised that it was ,learned today that two Council members who had expected to be present would not be able to be at the Council meeting this evening For that reason, staff had presumed that, based on earlier state- ments, Council would wish to continue the public hearing There- fore those interested in participating in the public hearing had I been notified that a full Council would not be present and that it was unlikely the matter would be considered at this time Mr Fales recommended the matter be continued in accordance with earlier Council decision. 6 Vice Mayor Williams reported that, after learning of the unexpected absences of two Council members, he had also advised some of those interested that it was unlikely the proposed revisions would be con- sidered as previously scheduled. Vice Mayor Williams advised that after discussion with individual Council members, he has determined that the next Council meeting when a full Council can be expected to be present will be on October 13, when it would be expected that consideration of the proposed revisions should be completed MOTION Councilman Henderson moved, seconded by Councilman Rhodes , to continue the public hearing on the proposed General Plan Re- visions relating to the Redwood' Shores area until October 13, 1975 The motion carried unanimously by voice vote (MINUTE ORDER NO 75-177) Master Agreement for Federal Aid Urban (EAU) Projects City Manager Fales referred to his report of September 4, 1975 regarding the subject agreement and attaching report from the Director of Public Works dated August 22, together with a copy of the proposed Master Agreement and letter of transmittal from the State Department of Transportation, dated July 15. In response to Council question, Mr Fales advised that while the Governor has frozen certain State highway funds, the State portion of the subject projects is usually the time involved in design and , engineering which represents a substantial contribution. I 9 In further response to question, Director of Public Works Pusich advised that the State is willing to participate and the City can wait until the fund being withheld are again available, however, federal funding may be adversely affected Mr Pusich and Mr Fales suggested it is preferable to proceed with execution of the agreement at this time in order to have a written agreement with the State representing an obligation on their part MOTION. Title having been read, Councilman Barrett introduced the following resolution and moved, seconded by Councilman Henderson, its adoption RESOLUTION NO 7487 APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY AND THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA (DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION) I FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF "FAU" PROJECTS The resolution was adopted unanimously by roll call vote -2- Reg Mtg 9/15/75