My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
CC MIN 03-24- to 05-21-1981
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1981
>
CC MIN 03-24- to 05-21-1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2015 8:54:34 AM
Creation date
3/18/2015 8:53:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
3/24/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mayor Mario Biagi ®� i <br /> vire Mayor Wm.J.Stange) RBdWOOd i MINUTES <br /> Councilmen C j�/ammo a <br /> CITY COUNCIL <br /> Brenton C.Britxhgi OM/hula►1 Joint Meeting <br /> rT Robert H.Bury <br /> Gerald R.Chandler 1 CITY COUNCIL/LIBRARY BOARD <br /> Marguerite Leipzig <br /> Bill anode, Schaberg Branch Library <br /> March 24, 1981 <br /> Joint Meeting <br /> The Council of the City of Redwood City met on this date with the Library <br /> Board at 7:40 p.m. in the Schaberg Branch Library, Mayor Biagi presiding. <br /> • <br /> Councilmen present: Britschgi, Bury, Leipzig, Rhodes, Stangel and <br /> Mayor Biagi <br /> Councilmen absent: Chandler <br /> Board members present: Collins, Kenney, Piombo, Robinson and <br /> President Callis <br /> Officials and staff present: City Manager Fales, City Attorney Schricker, <br /> City Clerk Hildebrand and City Librarian <br /> Vollmayer <br /> DISCUSSION - NEW MAIN LIBRARY <br /> President Callis referred to the Board of Library Trustees report of <br /> March 18, 1981 and commented concerning the increasingly desperate <br /> situation at the Main Library with regard to overcrowding and the re- <br /> sultant inefficient and expensive service, as well as the inability of <br /> the Library to provide some ordinary and desirable library services. <br /> Mrs. Callis observed that there has been recognition by Council for <br /> several years of the need for a new library building and acknowledged <br /> that the recent attempt of Council to meet the need was thwarted by the <br /> passage of Proposition 13. She pointed out that overcrowding is in- <br /> creasing and construction costs are rising and urged Council to do <br /> law whatever may be possible to construct a new Main Library. • <br /> Discussion followed and—Council and Library Board members and City <br /> Librarian Vollmayer commented and replied to questions regarding the <br /> possibility of proceeding with site selection and architectural plans <br /> in order to be prepared when and if funds should become available; the <br /> need to construct a building and also provide maintenance funds; the <br /> extent to which the City is reimbursed for library use by non-resident <br /> patrons; the fact that reimbursement from the State is equitable; means <br /> of financing a new library and whether a combination of methods is pos- <br /> sible; the value of sharing library resources which the City enjoys in <br /> cooperation with other cities and the County; the desire of Council <br /> members to provide adequate library service to Redwood City residents; <br /> and whether the City-owned property in the Main Street area might be <br /> used in some way. <br /> Library Board members described the experiences of the cities of <br /> Roseville and Placerville in constructing new libraries. It was re- <br /> ported that by having a site and plans immediately available, Roseville <br /> was able to obtain a federal EDA grant which required that construction <br /> must be able to get under way within 60 days. City Manager Fales ad- <br /> vised that the City made use of such a grant with regard to construction <br /> of a water line at the Port, but that aside from certain accounting <br /> problems which were encountered, it was satisfactory. However, there <br /> is no reason to believe such grants will be available again. <br /> Discussion then was directed at the possibility of obtaining the vote <br /> required under Proposition 13 on a bond issue to construct the library. <br /> City Attorney Schricker pointed out that because of that Proposition, <br /> general obligation bonds are no longer a possibility at all, and that <br /> any bond election would involve a special assessment district. He ob- <br /> served that the favorable vote required is two-thirds of the registered <br /> voters of the district, not of those voting, and that it is very rare to <br /> have a 66% voter turnout, let alone expect them all to vote for library <br /> bonds, although it is theoretically possible. He suggested that there • <br /> Jnt./Mtg. <br /> 3/24/81 <br /> _ . . r. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.