CC MIN 01-07 to 12-15-1980 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

27 � AGENDA (continued) ACTION TAKEN (continued) PUBLIC HEARINGS (continued) PUBLIC HEARINGS (continued) test 2. (continued) Mr. Schricker observed that a comprehensive review of the sign ordinance is presently going on and that if changes are to be made they must apply to categories not to indi- vidual signs. Mayor Biagi invited anyone else present who wished to speak to do so. No one wished to speak. M/S: Leipzig/Rhodes to close the public hearing. Carried unanimously by voice vote and hearing closed at 8:03 p.m. Discussion continued and Mr. Schricker and City Manager Fales commented and replied to questions regarding the sign ordinance pro- vision for one sign per shopping center; the kind of variance circumstances and standards which could be established for categories; the possibility that shopping centers could be subdivided into many parcels, if the precedent for doing so were set; whether signs are necessary for a good shopping center; the treatment of contiguous parcels with the same owner as one parcel by the assessor; the fact that increased business at a shopping center provides sales tax revenue and jobs; the fact ""' that the Attorney's office is putting into legal form the material developed with regard to review of the provisions for signs adjacent to freeways; the possibility of using public property for a sign which is truly directional; and the fact that one sign for the shopping center has been approved (Sign "A"). M/S: Leipzig/Stangel to uphold the denial of the applications for proposed sign "B" (more than one sign for the same shopping center and primarily viewed from freeway in violation of Sections 3.101 and 3.129 of the Code) and pro- posed sign "C" (located off premises in viola- ' tion of Section 3.94) and to direct staff to work with the applicant and prepare a revocable permit for the directional sign ("C") to be returned to Council. ADDITION TO MOTION: In accordance with the consensus of Council, Councilman Leipzig, with the consent of her second, added to the motion that the proposed directional sign is to be smaller than the 6'6" x 10'5" proposed. The motion with the addition carried by majority voice vote. MINUTE ORDER NO. 80-94 REPORTS OF BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS REPORTS OF BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS None None ppm Reg.Mtg. 6/23/80 Page 3 / f `�, Y .. ;;.. „- }s.• ":s1a..- ., -.. -. �•. �;_ „gy, .._ :` „"§ .,..: ..:. "fir" ';;.,may,s ...wit, "'..' 'r1 :YZ-'.. ? R....z .