My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Res04 14590
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
City Council
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
Res04 14590
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/14/2011 1:17:40 PM
Creation date
6/9/2004 2:12:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Agency Type
City Council
Date
6/7/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
122
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
06/07/2004 <br />the Project, if financially sustainable at all, could not generate sufficient revenue to <br />provide public access, waterfront features and other community - serving amenities <br />which are also fundamental, identified Project objectives. Based on the foregoing and <br />the discussion in Section 17.2 of the FEIR, the City finds that, on balance, the Project <br />provides substantially greater public benefits than Alternative 2 and that Alternative 2 is <br />not a feasible alternative to the Project. <br />C. Buildout Under Existing General Plan And Zoning Entitlements — All <br />Commercial (Alternative 3) <br />Description: Alternative 3 assumes development of the Project site with <br />the maximum commercial floor area permissible under current General Plan and zoning <br />designations, resulting in development of up to approximately 1,250,000 square feet of <br />commercial floor area, including 1,230,000 square feet of office area and 20,000 square <br />feet of retail- restaurant floor area. <br />Findings: As compared to the proposed Project, Alternative 3 would <br />result in reduced, but still significant, environmental impacts in the areas of land use, <br />visual impacts, biological resources, infrastructure and public services, soils and <br />geology, public health and safety, noise, and cultural and historic resources. Like <br />Alternative 2, Alternative 3 would actually result in slightly increased transportation and <br />circulation environmental impacts. Environmental impacts in the areas of hydrology and <br />water quality and air quality would be similar to those associated with the Project. With <br />respect to population, housing and employment, Alternative 3, with no residential <br />development at all, would contribute substantially to the existing citywide imbalance <br />between residents and jobs, resulting in increased in- commuting. It would completely <br />fail to achieve the basic housing - related objectives of the Project identified in the <br />discussion of the No Project Alternative above and in the FEIR, and is therefore not a <br />feasible alternative to the Project. <br />D. Reduced Commercial, With Reduced Building Heights And Reduced <br />Marina Fill (Alternative 4) <br />Description: Alternative 4 assumes that the Project site would be <br />developed as a mixed use residential - commercial complex similar to the proposed <br />Project, with the same residential unit total (1,930 condominium residential units for <br />sale) but with less commercial floor area, as a means of reducing building intensity and <br />height and reducing the amount of marina fill. Alternative 4 would reduce the amount of <br />commercial floor area from 312,000 square feet under the Initial Project to 162,000 <br />square feet, including 12,000 square feet of convenience retail /restaurant space (less <br />than the Project) and 150,000 square feet of office space (versus 300,000 square feet <br />for the Initial Project). The reduced commercial floor area would permit an increase in <br />the number of multi -story residential structures from 13 under the Initial Project to 15, an <br />associated (8 %) reduction in the maximum residential structure height from 260 feet <br />down to 240 feet and a reduction in marina fill from approximately 11.54 acres under the <br />Initial Project or 10 acres under the proposed Project, to approximately 9 acres under <br />Alternative 4. <br />1289 \02 \179278.2 37 <br />Atty /Reso /Reso.1470 14590 <br />060804 Muff # 304 Bin 26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.