Laserfiche WebLink
Legend: Applicant = project applicant, City = City of Redwood City <br />Page 4 May 18, 2004 WP9.016451MMCHT.645 <br />MG. _ . ORING <br />VERIFIG_ ION <br />IDENTIFIED IMPACT <br />RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE <br />Impl. <br />Type of Impl. <br />Monitoring and <br />Timing <br />Signature <br />Date <br />(CONDITION OF APPROVAL) <br />Entity <br />Action <br />Verification Entity <br />Requirements <br />isolated). However, unless the project can <br />and/or hubs, including the El Camino <br />demonstrate to City satisfaction: (1) adequate <br />Real transit corridor and Redwood City <br />water and parks facilities, (2) a convenient and <br />CalTrain intermodal station, and <br />effective transit link to a local and regional <br />between the project, downtown <br />express transit corridor or hub (e.g., the EI <br />Redwood City, and other local <br />Camino Real transit corridor and Redwood <br />employment, financial, and retail <br />City /CalTrain intermodal station) and to the <br />concentrations; <br />Redwood City downtown, (3) retail <br />commercial provisions sufficient to serve the <br />on -site retail commercial provisions <br />convenience needs of project residents and <br />sufficient to serve the convenience <br />businesses, and (4) a specific and substantial <br />retail needs of project residences and <br />below market rate housing component, the <br />businesses; <br />project would be inconsistent with various key <br />City and ABAG "smart growth" policies. This <br />. a substantial affordable housing <br />possible project inconsistency with applicable <br />component, and <br />locai and regional land use policies represents <br />a potentiall significant environmental <br />. implementation of all mitigations <br />impact. <br />identified in chapters 8 (Biological <br />Resources) and 12 (Public Health and <br />Safety) of this EIR as necessary to <br />reduce project - related ecological <br />impacts and environmental hazards to <br />less -than- significant levels. <br />Implementation of this measure would <br />reduce this potential project policy <br />inconsistency to a less - than - significant <br />level. <br />VISUAL FACTORS <br />Impact 5 -1: Project Inconsistency with City <br />Mitigation 5 -1. Implement one of the <br />Applicant/ <br />Redesign project to <br />City <br />Prior to Precise <br />Height - Related Policies and Regulations. <br />following two alternative mitigations: <br />City <br />incorporate 75 -foot <br />Plan adoption <br />The City's General Plan states that "The <br />maximum building <br />visual qualities of the community should be <br />Mitigation Alternative 5 -1 -1: Reduce <br />heights, or <br />preserved and improved" (Policy C -7). For <br />the maximum project building heights <br />incorporate design <br />General Commercial zoned properties such <br />on both properties to 75 feet, which <br />standards and <br />as the Peninsula Marina property, the City's <br />would reduce this policy and regulatory <br />guidelines into <br />Zoning Ordinance stipulates, "No structure <br />consistency impact to a less -than- <br />Precise Plan <br />shall exceed seventy-five (75) feet in height." <br />significant level. <br />requiring City <br />For Residential Combining District zoned <br />adoption. <br />properties such as the Pete's Harbor property, <br />OR <br />the Zoning Ordinance stipulates that building <br />Legend: Applicant = project applicant, City = City of Redwood City <br />Page 4 May 18, 2004 WP9.016451MMCHT.645 <br />