Res04 14590 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Legend. Applicant = project applicant, City = City of Redwood City Page 32 May 18, 2004 WP9.016451MMCHT.645 MO, . ORING VERIFIC.. . tbN IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Impl. Type of Impl. Monitoring and Timing Signature Date (CONDITION OF APPROVAL) Entity Action Verification Entity Requirements University Avenue to the County Line management (TDM) program, as described development Segments - -PM Peak Hour. Capacity results under Mitigation 7 -2. agreement analysis indicate that the V/C ratio for these approval; annual two SR 84 segments under Cumulative Full mitigation of this impact (i.e., to less- City review of Conditions would be greater than 1.0 (with and than - significant level) would require the TDM program without the ro osed ro ject is The project p p project). addition of another eastbound through lane annual report expected to increase traffic volumes by more to both segments. The addition of another continuing for than one percent of the segments' capacity through travel lane, with a capacity of 1,100 five years after during the PM peak hour. This effect would vehicles per lane per hour, would more than full project represent a significant cumulative impact offset the addition of project traffic (the buildout project -- Alternative 6 - -is expected to add approximately 54 trips to the segments). However, freeway widening is generally considered to be beyond the scope of a single development project- -i.e., an infeasible mitigation requirement. Therefore, the effect of project traffic on these segments is considered to represent a significant unavoidable Impact (i.e., would require City adoption of a Statement of Overriding Considerations). BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Impact 8 -1: Impacts on Steelhead and Mitigation 8 -1. The applicant shall: Applicant Coordinate with City Coordinate with Chinook Salmon. The proposed project (1) coordinate with the NMFS and CDFG on National Marine NMFS and would fill approximately 11.54 acres of steelhead and chinook salmon issues; and Fisheries Service CDFG, and estuarine habitat for the steelhead, a federally (2) formulate and implement a Habitat (NMFS) and formulate listed threatened species, chinook salmon- Mitigation and Monitoring Plan (HMMP) for California Dept. of HMMP, prior to California Coastal ESU, also a federally listed these species to the satisfaction of the Fish and Game grading permit threatened species, and chinook salmon- NMFS and CDFG. The HMMP should (CDFG); formulate issuance; Central Valley fall/late fall run, a federally listed include, but not be limited to, the following and implement implement species of concern and state - listed species of provisions: Habitat Mitigation HMMP during special concern. Construction activities could and Monitoring construction also result in increased water turbidity, The construction contractor shall use a Plan (HMMP). contaminant release, noise, and underwater silt curtain around the area where shock waves within this habitat. These dredging activities are likely to release possible effects represent a potentially sediment into Redwood Creek or Smith significant impact. Slough and where construction activities are directly adjacent to estuarine habitat. The water shall be monitored to verify that the silt curtains contain turbidity to Legend. Applicant = project applicant, City = City of Redwood City Page 32 May 18, 2004 WP9.016451MMCHT.645