Res04 14590 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Legend: Applicant = project applicant, City = City of Redwood City Page 38 May 18, 2004 WP9.016451MMCHT.645 MOB. JRING VERIFIC-iON IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Impl. Type of Impl. Monitoring and Timing Signature Date (CONDITION OF APPROVAL) Entity Action Verification Entity Requirements Impact 8 -7: Project- Related Loss of Fresh Mitigation 8 -7. The applicant shall Applicant Implement City Obtain permits Emergent Wetlands. The proposed project implement Mitigation 8 -6. The City of Mitigation 8 -6. prior to grading would fill fresh emergent wetlands. Loss of Redwood City shall not issue a grading permit issuance; fresh emergent wetlands would represent a permit for the project until the permits have implement potentially significant impact. been obtained by the applicant and the HMMP during associated mitigation and monitoring plans construction have been approved by the responsible agencies. Implementation of these measures would reduce this potential impact to a less - than - significant level. Impact 8 -8: Project - Related Bird Mitigation 8 -8. Although bird collisions are Applicant/ Adopt and City Prior to Desim Collisions. The project proposes to construct a significant unavoidable impact (i.e., City implement project Review up to seventeen up- to-21 -23 -story towers, and would require City adoption of a Statement lighting policy. (Architectural) additional office space and low -rise flats of Overriding Considerations), collisions Permit approval ranging from four to nine stories. Such may be reduced by adopting, as part of the structures are likely to cause substantial bird project's architectural review process, a collision mortality due to lighting and window lighting policy that strives for minimal hazards. These collisions are inevitable and exterior night - lighting, requires adoption of constitute a significant unavoidable impact low- intensity exterior lighting, uses cutoff lights and shielding techniques that focus exterior light downward, and includes perimeter lights that are timed by project management to shut off automatically when not in use. Impact 8 -9: Project - Related General Mitigation 8 -9. Implementation of Mitigation Applicant/ Adopt and City Prior to Design Outdoor Lighting Impacts on Biological 8 -8 would reduce this potential impact to a City implement project Review Resources. The project would result in less- than - significant level. lighting policy. (Architectural) additional lighting at a close distance to Permit approval sensitive wetland habitats. Outdoor lighting from the proposed project may adversely affect nocturnal, roosting, and nesting birds, and disrupt natural diurnal rhythms of a wide range of animals and plants. These possible effects represent a potentially significant impact. Impact 8 -10: Project - Related Introduction Mitigation 8 -10. Eliminating the invasive, Applicant Revise landscape City Prior to Design of Invasive, Non - Native Plants. Since the non- native species listed above from the plan plant list. Review project site is adjacent to Middle Bair Island, a landscape plan would reduce this identified (Architectural) federally managed wildlife reserve, invasive potential impact of using non - native species Permit approval non - native plant species could have an to a less- than - significant level. Legend: Applicant = project applicant, City = City of Redwood City Page 38 May 18, 2004 WP9.016451MMCHT.645