My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2015-04-13 Closed and Joint SA and PFA REVISED 04_10_2015
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
AgdaPkt 2015-04-13 Closed and Joint SA and PFA REVISED 04_10_2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2015 8:11:02 AM
Creation date
4/9/2015 4:34:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
4/13/2015
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
385
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
9.A. - Page 5 <br /> • Zoning Administrator Public Hearing (Threshold for Review): Rather than <br /> the PD process mentioned above, any addition on lots exceeding 30% slope <br /> would require a Zoning Administrator hearing. For homes on lots of 15% slope or <br /> more, additions or modifications that result in a total square footage of 3,000 <br /> square feet or more would require a Zoning Administrator Hearing with an <br /> Architectural Permit. Neighbors will be invited to the meeting, and the decision <br /> will be appealable to the Planning Commission. The Zoning Administrator will <br /> also have to make additional findings specific to hillside areas. <br /> • Increased Review Standards by Requiring Specific Findings to Approve <br /> Hillside Development: Staff proposes that all new development and second <br /> story additions on lots with slopes of 15% or more be subject to specific findings <br /> to address hillside issues. These findings include safety, respecting the natural <br /> constraints of the site, minimizing bulk and mass and preserving trees and <br /> vegetation (Proposed Section 45.8). This further ensures safety, protection of <br /> vegetation and well-designed homes on sloped lots. <br /> • Require that hillside safety and existing landscape be a basis of design, by <br /> requiring additional Application Materials at Planning Submittal. For any <br /> Architectural Permit on a lot of 15% slope or more, the following materials are <br /> required: <br /> A conceptual landscape plan, including all existing natural features such <br /> as trees, shrubs, streams, creeks and drain channels, in accordance with <br /> applicable fire protection standards; and <br /> A topographic survey for any second story addition or new two-story <br /> home; and <br /> A geologic soils report; and <br /> Information delineating the project area that is not to be disturbed. <br /> This information will ensure a more thoughtful design occurs earlier in the <br /> process. <br /> • Increase Compatibility and Consistency by requiring increased Second- <br /> Story Setbacks in the RH: Staff proposes second-story setbacks that are the <br /> same as those required in the R-1 Zoning District. This reduces the bulkiness of <br /> a structure and assists in integrating the home with the natural features. <br /> • Minimize Grading and Increase Compatibility by Reducing Front Setback <br /> for Garages: Allows for homes to be set more closely into the existing upslope <br /> or downslope of the lot by allowing garages closer than 20 feet in certain <br /> situations. This ensures that homes can be integrated into the hillside slope. <br /> In addition to the new requirements, staff is also organizing and cleaning up related <br /> code language. See Attachment 4, Summary of Ordinance Changes, for a detailed <br /> description of these items. <br /> Page 5 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.