My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2015-04-13 Closed and Joint SA and PFA REVISED 04_10_2015
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
AgdaPkt 2015-04-13 Closed and Joint SA and PFA REVISED 04_10_2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2015 8:11:02 AM
Creation date
4/9/2015 4:34:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
4/13/2015
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
385
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
9.A. - Page 31 <br /> PROJECT DESCRIPTION <br /> The proposed amendments affect several different sections of the Zoning Ordinance. <br /> Table 1: Summary of Recommended Zoning Ordinance Revisions <br /> Section What Why <br /> Article 2: Move and reword "average slope" This definition would be referred to <br /> Definitions definition from Article 32.2 to in both the R-1/RH article (new <br /> Article 2. Revise illustrative Article 5) and the "Supplementary <br /> diagrams to clarify requirements. Building Site Areas" (Article 32). <br /> The meaning of definition would <br /> not change. <br /> Article 4 Combine existing Article 4 (RH) • All regulations would be <br /> and 5: RH and Article 5 (R-1) into one article contained in one article; <br /> and R-1 (new Article 5 (R-1/RH)) and add a promotes ease of use. This <br /> section for additional sloping sites change would also allow <br /> regulations (see below). This supplementary hillside <br /> involves minor modifications to regulations to be placed within <br /> regulations regarding "guest the R-1/RH article. It currently <br /> houses" and "parking lots" in order exists in a separate article. <br /> to simplify and make consistent • Additional setbacks on the <br /> with existing accessory dwelling upper floor would control <br /> unit regulations and R-1 standards. massing and bulk of structures. <br /> Diagrams have been added to <br /> illustrate setback requirements. <br /> Require second story setbacks in <br /> RH district, similar to those in the <br /> R-1 district. <br /> Section • Reduce front yard setbacks for • A reduced setback for garages <br /> 5.8: garages on steeply sloping is a common deviation typically <br /> Additional sites. requested by property owners. <br /> Require- • Requirement for additional • Additional information will help <br /> ments for information at Planning review the City make informed <br /> Sloping stage including landscape decisions, particularly with tree <br /> Lots plans and geologic reports, preservation and building safety <br /> • Add requirements for under • Minimizing underfloor areas <br /> floor areas. reduces bulk and ensures that <br /> • Establish a slope/FAR the home is built more closely <br /> threshold for review by the to the natural topography of the <br /> Zoning Administrator (can be site. <br /> appealed to the Planning • Thresholds for review and <br /> Commission). specific criteria would allow for <br /> public participation and <br /> provide comprehensive findings <br /> for decisions. <br /> Section • Clarify that Planned • Removes the ability to request <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.