Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> Comment 5 : Ordinance doesn ' t go far <br /> enough ( FAR <br /> ■ Proposed ordinances puts further requirements on development, does not <br /> "open up the potential for far more intense development" <br /> ■ Staff seriously considered FAR, however: <br /> ■ Implementation difficult due to sloped lots spanning R-1 and R-H zoning districts <br /> ■ Would create numerous non-conformities <br /> ■ Would not allow flexibility for small additions that exceed hard FAR cap <br /> ■ Safety and Neighborhood Compatibly are Primary Concerns: <br /> 1 <br /> ■ FAR does not determine whether home is constructed in a safe manner <br /> ■ Compatibility is not determined by home size <br /> ■ Elimination of PD process will create more certainty <br /> ■ Even with FAR requirements, planning staff review would still be required. <br /> . <br />