Laserfiche WebLink
4- <br /> • Agreement No. FTA04A39 <br /> Sheet 12 of 13 <br /> Section 4. RECIPIENT shall request, in writing, STATE's advance <br /> approval if grant funds are to be allocated to any NUP, except"incidental use" <br /> property described below. If property, the costs of which have previously been <br /> allocated to grant funds; is to become NUP before the State bond funds are fully <br /> paid or redeemed, then RECIPIENT may allocate the costs of such property to <br /> another funding source as provided in Section 3 of this Article VI, or obtain <br /> STATE's approval that the allocation of the costs of such property to the grant <br /> funds may remain. It is anticipated that STATE approval will be granted if, <br /> taking into account the existing and expected uses of the proceeds of the State <br /> bonds, the STATE determines that the continued tax-exempt status of the State <br /> bonds will not be adversely affected and that the use of the property is consistent <br /> with the Project and its described purpose. <br /> For purposes of these Articles VI Section 3 fund source allocations, <br /> RECIPIENT does not have to take into account as NUP those "incidental uses" of <br /> the Project(such as, for example, advertising billboards, vending machines, <br /> telephones, etc.) which meet requirements of federal tax regulations (IRS Notice <br /> 87-69 or any successor thereto). In general such Notice requires that the <br /> incidental use not be physically separated from the rest of the Project and not <br /> comprise in the aggregate more than 2-1/2% of the costs of the Project. <br /> Section 5. If RECIPIENT enters into a management contract with a <br /> private party (including AMTRAK) for operation of rail, ferry or other <br /> transportation services in connection with the Project, it will either (a) obtain <br /> approval from Bond Counsel acceptable to STATE that the terms of the <br /> management contract meet the requirements of Internal Revenue Service <br /> Revenue Procedure 82-14 (as supplemented or amended) or any successor <br /> thereto (dealing generally with guidelines for when management contracts may <br /> be deemed not to create a "private use" of bond-financed property) or are <br /> otherwise acceptable; or (b) be prepared to certify upon request of STATE that <br /> the revenues which RECIPIENT (or its manager) will receive directly from the <br /> operation of transportation services in connection with the Project(but not <br /> including any subsidy of the transportation operation from taxes or other <br /> outside fund sources) are for any fiscal year less than the ordinary and necessary <br /> expenses directly attributable to the operation and maintenance of the <br /> transportation system (excluding any overhead or administrative costs of <br /> RECIPIENT). In any year for which option (b) will not be true, RECIPIENT <br /> shall consult Bond Counsel acceptable to the State Treasurer's Office to obtain <br /> approval of the management contract or an opinion that the circumstances <br /> present will not adversely affect the tax-exempt status of the bonds. <br /> Section 6. If RECIPIENT receives any revenues or profits from any NUP <br /> allowed pursuant to this Article VI(whether approved at this time or hereafter <br /> approved by STATE), RECIPIENT agrees that such revenues or profits shall be <br />