My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2015-05-18 Closed and Joint SA and PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
AgdaPkt 2015-05-18 Closed and Joint SA and PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2015 3:06:59 PM
Creation date
5/14/2015 4:16:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
5/8/2015
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
285
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7.1.D. - Page 14 <br /> mail system, though the change does not signal particular gains for either political party. <br /> 18 <br /> Another study of Oregon's subsequent turnout by Karp and Banducci (2000) found <br /> that an all vote-by-mail system was only likely to increase turnout in likely voters. That <br /> is, voters of high socioeconomic status who are predisposed to vote but do not have the <br /> time to do so or do not typically find it convenient. Moreover, the increase in turnout was <br /> most associated with local and primary elections, in which turnout is typically low. <br /> Among the low income and disenfranchised they found little to no change and suggested <br /> that even lowering administrative requirements would unlikely solve the issue of low <br /> turnout among these populations.19 <br /> A Common Cause policy brief of vote-by-mail elections states that, in general, they <br /> had the potential to increase voter turnout by 4-5% in general elections and by an even <br /> larger margin for off-year or local elections.20 <br /> The Oregon studies found that voters who had never voted before were unlikely to <br /> start as a result of vote-by-mail elections but those who voted in larger elections would be <br /> more likely to participate in local elections as well. Other benefits included reduced cost, <br /> more time for voters to deliberate, and fewer logistical issues related to voting in person. <br /> 18 Southwell,Priscilla L. "Vote by mail:Voter Preferences and Self-Reported Voting Behavior."All Academic <br /> Research.American Political Science Association,5 Sept.2004.Web. 12 Nov.2013. <br /> <http://citation.allacademic.com//meta/p_mla_apa_research_citation/0/6/0/7/3/pages60739/p60739-1.php>. <br /> 19 Karp,Jefferey A.,and Susan A.Banducci. "Going Postal:How All-Mail Elections Influence Turnout."Political <br /> Behavior 22.3(2000):223-39.Web. 15 Nov.2013.<http://www.jstor.org/stable/1520048>. <br /> 20 This policy brief does not seem to be based on specific research <br /> http://www.commoncause.org/site/pp.asp?c=dkLNK1MQIwG&b=3790039 <br /> 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.