Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br />CITY MANAGER'S TRANSMITTAL LETTER <br /> <br />Seaport Centre Maintenance District <br />City of Redwood City <br />County of San Mateo, State of California <br /> <br /> <br />The City Manager of the City of Redwood City, County of San Mateo, State of <br />California, makes this report, as directed by the City Council, pursuant to Section <br />18.104 of Article XII of Chapter 18 of the Code of the City of Redwood City, as <br />amended. Accompanying this Report is the Engineer’s Report, prepared in accordance <br />with Article XIII D of the California Constitution, enacted by approval of Proposition No. <br />218 in the November 5, 1996 statewide general election. <br /> <br />The Seaport Centre Maintenance District (the "District") was established in April <br />1985 to pay for the cost and expense of maintaining and operating certain public <br />improvements within the District that will be of benefit to parcels within the District. In <br />November 5, 1996 California voters amended the California Constitution with the <br />passage of Proposition No. 218. Pursuant to Proposition No. 218, as of July 1, 1997, <br />assessments must be approved by a majority vote protest procedure. Assessments <br />were last approved by property owners in 2010 for a five year period ending June 30, <br />2015. <br /> <br />The District encompasses all of the area included in the Seaport Centre <br />business park development as filed in the subdivision maps entitled “SEAPORT <br />CENTRE SUBDIVISION OF PARCEL A “AMENDED MAP” OF PARCEL MAP NO. 82- <br />1”, which map was filed for record in the office of the County Recorder of the County of <br />San Mateo on August 31, 1984 at Volume 112 of Subdivision Maps at Pages 4, 5, and <br />6. <br /> <br />The District was established to maintain certain public utility facilities on public <br />easements determined to be of sole benefit to the parcels within the District. <br /> <br />The prior property owner vote approved only a five year cumulative levy. Any <br />continuation of the levy at its current amount beyond the fiscal year ending June 30, <br />2015 requires a majority protest vote of affected property owners. In consultation with <br />property owners, staff has prepared a new annual budget for the District. Property <br />owners will vote to approve the proposed annual property tax assessment. <br /> <br /> The Engineer’s Report, set forth as an attachment to this report, includes the <br />annual budget of the District, the formula for allocating the annual budget requirement <br />among property owners, and an assessment spread showing the amount to be levied <br />on each parcel in the District. <br /> <br /> The property owner ballot and the notice to be mailed to property owners as <br />required pursuant to Proposition 218 are included as exhibits to the Resolution of <br />Intention to levy assessments that is before the Council for its consideration. <br />Page 2 of 19 <br />7.2.G. - Page 9