Laserfiche WebLink
17 | Page February 5, 2015 <br /> <br />obligations under this Agreement and which result from the <br />negligent or wrongful acts of each City or its officers, employees, <br />or agents, including, but not limited to, those claims, suits, or <br />actions arising from activities performed by the County as a <br />representative of the City as set forth in Sections 3.6 and 4.2. <br /> <br />b. The County shall hold harmless, indemnify and defend each City, <br />its officers, employees and agents from and against any and all <br />claims, suits or actions of any kind brought for or on account of <br />injuries to or death of any person or damage to any property of <br />any kind and to whomsoever belonging which arise out of the <br />performance or non-performance of the County’s obligations <br />under this Agreement and which result from the negligent or <br />wrongful acts of the County, its officers or employees. This <br />provision requiring the County to hold harmless, indemnify and <br />defend each City shall expressly not apply to claims, losses, <br />liabilities or damages arising from actions or omissions, negligent <br />or otherwise, of the Animal Control Contractor or the Animal <br />Licensing Contractor, or their officers, employees or agents, under <br />the services agreements with the County. Further, this provision <br />requiring the County to hold harmless, indemnify and defend each <br />City shall not apply to acts or omissions of the County done on <br />behalf of each City in performing administrative tasks for the <br />convenience of each City as set forth in Sections 3.6 and 4.2. <br /> <br />c. In the event of concurrent negligence of the County, its officer or <br />employees, and the City, its officers and employees, the liability <br />for any and all claims for injuries or damages to persons and/or <br />property or any other loss or costs which arise out of the terms, <br />conditions, covenants or responsibilities of this agreement shall <br />be apportioned according to the California theory of comparative <br />negligence. <br /> <br />d. Finally, Parties acknowledge that with respect to activities <br />performed by the Animal Control Contractor or the Animal <br />Licensing Contractor in the Cities’ territorial limits, the County <br />serves solely as a Contract Administrator and solely with respect <br />to the specific obligations contained within this Agreement and the <br />agreements between the County and the Animal Control <br />Contractor and the Animal Licensing Contractor. Accordingly, in <br />the event the County or the Cities are sued and the suit is related <br />in any manner to actions taken by the Animal Control Contractor <br />or the Animal Licensing Contractor solely in a particular City or the <br />Cities, the particular City or Cities, as the case may be, will hold <br />harmless, indemnify and defend the County, and any other City <br />that is named as a defendant in that suit from and against any and