Laserfiche WebLink
7.1.Q. - Page 2 <br /> inspections. While much of the work is accomplished by staff, consultants have been <br /> retained during high volume periods and for specialized assistance on large scale and <br /> complicated projects to augment and enhance the City's ability to provide timely <br /> responses to the applicants. <br /> In recent years, the expansion of commercial and residential development has <br /> precipitated a significant amount of building permit and plan check fees. <br /> Building Permit and Plan Check Fees <br /> (rounded to nearest 000s) <br /> FY Building Permit Fees Plan Check Fees <br /> 08 -09 $782,000 $393,000 <br /> 09 -10 $774,000 $375,000 <br /> 10 -11 $997,000 $388,000 <br /> 11 -12 $1,173,000 $871,000 <br /> 12 -13 $1,881,000 $860,000 <br /> 13 -14 $2,546,000 $1,506,000 <br /> 14 -15* $2,050,000 $1,356,000 <br /> *Through June 22, 2015 <br /> Shums Coda & Associates' proposed on -site fee ranges from $55 to $125 per hour. <br /> The proposed off -site fee ranges from 50 to 70 percent of building plan check fees. The <br /> consultant fee rates are standard arrangements among many Bay Area communities. <br /> Keeping these consultants on retainer allows the City two quickly access four <br /> consultants when specialized or complicated applications are submitted. <br /> While these fees are consistent with the service provided for smaller projects, the City <br /> can achieve a better rate for larger projects that pay significantly higher plan check fees <br /> through a competitive bidding process. If Council approves the Shums Coda & <br /> Associates' agreement and the other three consultant agreements (presented in <br /> separate staff reports), the Building Division will require these four consultants to bid on <br /> large projects for plan check services. As a result, the City will receive different and <br /> more competitive rates on larger projects through this bidding process. <br /> If large projects requiring plan check are submitted to the City, payments to Shums <br /> Coda & Associates may be expended more rapidly than anticipated. Staff may need to <br /> request additional funds for such large projects from Council at a later date. <br /> ALTERNATIVES <br /> Council could choose to not approve the Agreement, which will significantly limit the <br /> City's ability to review plans, provide counter service to the public, and inspect <br /> construction sites within a timely manner. <br /> FISCAL IMPACT <br /> FY 15 -16 has an approved $324,000 budget ($175,000 in 150-63110-50 and $149,095 <br /> in 150 - 63310 -50) for professional services, of which $81,000 is available. <br />