Laserfiche WebLink
� , �-. a--i <br /> they thought was important to consider in making these tough decisions. Because of <br /> the process design, the feedback is not in the form of a request to "not cut° a particular <br /> program but on a more global scale. Lastly, of the 32 program evaluations received 21 <br /> rated the session as excellent, 10 good and 1 fair. A compilation of their reactions to <br /> the sessions is included as Attachment 3 and 4. Probably my most significant learning <br /> in this process is that community members are willing to take the time to give feedback, <br /> care very deeply about what happens in our City and are willing to get involved in <br /> potential solutions. <br /> Fiscal Impact <br /> None. <br /> � � . � <br /> �-'aC�� <br /> �Corinne Centeno Ed Everett <br /> Parks, Recreation and Community Services Director City Manager <br /> Attachment <br /> 1. 5/25/04 Budget — New Revenues Community Input Summary <br /> 2. 6/2/04 Budget — New Revenues Community Input Summary <br /> 3. Evaluation Summary from 5/25 Meeting <br /> 4. Evaluation Summary from 6/2 Meeting <br />