My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
CC Min 1996-10-28
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
CC Min 1996-10-28
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/8/2008 11:35:36 AM
Creation date
6/17/2004 4:53:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Agency Type
City Council
Date
10/28/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> . . I . - <br /> <br /> In response to Council questions, Port Commission Chairman Smith described the <br /> amendments incorporated in Joint Resolution P-1517 approved by the Port Commission <br /> and submitted to the Council for its adoption. Chainnan Smith advised that the changes in <br /> I....- the adopted Resolution clarified areas of Council and Port concern and did not change the <br /> original intent nor planned cooperation of Port tenants and private marinas in the joint <br /> effort to enforce Tariff 7. <br /> MIS: HOW ARDIRUSKIN. TITLE READ. <br /> JOINT RESOLUTION NO. 12946 OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY AND PORT OF <br /> REDWOOD CITY FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF TARIFF 7 OF THE PORT OF REDWOOD <br /> CITY (AQUA TERRA PROJECT); <br /> ADOPTED BY UNANIMOUS ROLL CALL VOTE. <br /> J. Mezes Plaza Project Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) - 5th Amendment (A <br /> companion Resolution of the Redevelopment Agency is on the Redevelopment Agency <br /> agenda scheduled immediately foIIowing the conclusion of this Council meeting.) (304, <br /> 1402-04) <br /> Report: Redevelopment Agency Executive Director, October 28, 1996 <br /> Mayor Hartnett described the City and Redevelopment Agency's interest in the Mezes <br /> Plaza Project and the need for changes to the DDA which would enhance the development <br /> I....- of the project. <br /> City AttorneylRedevelopment Agency Attorney Schricker advised that the 5th <br /> Amendment to the DDA "amends Section 913 of the Disposition and Development <br /> Agreement which deals with the expiration date. As drafted, the Amendment would <br /> extend the DDA to November 30, 1996 unless a letter of credit or cash deposit, which is <br /> required under the DDA, has been delivered to the Agency; or at the Agency's sole <br /> discretion (which is the Council acting in its capacity as the Redevelopment Agency), on <br /> an earlier date, if the Agency determines that the University of California has exercised its <br /> option to terminate its lease with the developer, or that the Bank of the West which is a <br /> lender to the developer, has refused to extend beyond October 31, 1996 its escrow with the <br /> developer, the repayment of the developers indebtedness on the first mortgage, those two <br /> items give the Agency grounds to terminate the DDA. What I propose doing is to add a <br /> revision to that clause which would provide as foIIows: <br /> 'In pursuance of the mutual interest of the parties in retaining the UC lease that the <br /> Agency may at its sole discretion and option directly communicate with the proposed <br /> lessee and propose amendments to the lease or propose other terms and conditions <br /> pertaining to the lease or to the lessee's occupancy of the premises which <br /> amendments, terms and conditions shall be subject to the Developer's approval <br /> which shall not unreasonably be withheld.' <br /> - <br /> REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTE BOOK'.INO. 54 OCTOBER28,1996 <br /> MINUTES PAGE 4 <br /> Page No. 554 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.