My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2015-09-21 Joint Special SAF PAF
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
AgdaPkt 2015-09-21 Joint Special SAF PAF
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/22/2015 12:12:16 PM
Creation date
9/18/2015 8:41:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
9/21/2015
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
756
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Red Morton Community Park Sports Lighting Initial Study <br />City of Redwood City 75 June 2015 <br />4.18 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE <br /> <br /> <br />Potentially <br />Significant <br />Impact <br />Less Than <br />Significant <br />With <br />Mitigation <br />Incorporated <br />Less Than <br />Significant <br />Impact <br />No Impact Checklist <br />Source(s) <br />1. Does the project have the potential to degrade <br />the quality of the environment, substantially <br />reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife <br />species, cause a fish or wildlife population to <br />drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to <br />eliminate a plant or animal community, <br />reduce the number or restrict the range of a <br />rare or endangered plant or animal or <br />eliminate important examples of the major <br />periods of California history or prehistory? <br /> 1-14 <br />2. Does the project have impacts that are <br />individually limited, but cumulatively <br />considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable” <br />means that the incremental effects of a project <br />are considerable when viewed in connection <br />with the effects of past projects, the effects of <br />other current projects, and the effects of <br />probable future projects)? <br /> 1-14 <br />3. Does the project have the potential to achieve <br />short-term environmental goals to the <br />disadvantage of long-term environmental <br />goals? <br /> 1-14 <br />4. Does the project have environmental effects <br />which will cause substantial adverse effects <br />on human beings, either directly or indirectly? <br /> 1-14 <br /> <br />4.18.1 Project Impacts <br /> <br />As described in the specific sections of this Initial Study (refer to Section 4.0 Environmental Setting, <br />Checklist, and Discussion of Impacts, Sections 4.1-4.17), the proposed project would not result in <br />significant environmental impacts. The project would not degrade the quality of the environment, <br />substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to <br />drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten a plant or animal community, reduce the number or <br />restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the <br />major periods of California history or prehistory. <br /> <br />4.18.2 Cumulative Impacts <br /> <br />Several of the environmental issues addressed in the previous sections of this Initial Study, such as <br />air quality and greenhouse gas emissions, are assessments of a project’s contribution to cumulative <br />effects on either a regional or global basis. These effects were found to b e insignificant. There are <br />no pending projects in the area that together with the proposed project will result in a cumulative <br />impact. <br />8.A. - Page 92
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.