My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2015-09-21 Joint Special SAF PAF
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
AgdaPkt 2015-09-21 Joint Special SAF PAF
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/22/2015 12:12:16 PM
Creation date
9/18/2015 8:41:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
9/21/2015
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
756
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ATTY/RESO.3134/CC RESO APPROVING PLANNED DEVELOPMENT – FINGER <br />REV: 09-17-15 VR <br />Page 7 of 29 <br />duration to match pre-project rates. The storm water system would <br />convey runoff to Finger Avenue, which feeds into the City’s storm drain <br />system at El Camino Real. <br /> <br />Section 5. Planned Development Modifications (Section 46.7 (A)): The City <br />Council finds that: <br /> <br />(a) Consistent with Zoning Ordinance Article 46 (Planned Development) the <br />City may permit any of the following requirements to be different from <br />those which would otherwise apply in the applicable zoning district if it is <br />determined that the proposed development will provide an environment of <br />physical and functional desirability, in harmony with the character of the <br />surrounding neighborhood or district: <br />1. Maximum heights for structures; <br />2. Maximum lot coverage; <br />3. Minimum building site sizes (a density increase is not permitted); <br />4. Minimum front, side, and rear yard setback requirements; <br />5. Minimum number of parking spaces required and parking space design. <br /> <br />(b) The Project complies with the requirements for maximum height, <br />maximum lot coverage, minimum lot size, minimum number of parking <br />spaces and required parking space design. <br />(c) The building setback modification to R-1 (Article 5) zoning standards are <br />sought: <br />• Lot 1: 6.7’ rear yard where 20’ is required (house) <br />• Lot 2: 18’ front setback where 20’ is required (garage) <br />• Lot 5: 13.5’ front yard where 15’ is required (porch) <br />6’ rear yard where 20’ is required (house) <br />• Lot 6: 7’ front yard where 15’ is required (porch) <br />4.5’ side yard on a corner lot where 15’ is required (porch) <br />7.3’ side yard on a corner lot where 15’ is required (house) <br />18.7’ rear yard where 20’ is required (attached garage) <br />• Lot 7: 4’ side yard where 6’ is required (detached garage) <br />4’ rear yard where 6’ is required (detached garage) <br />6’ side yard on a corner lot where 15’ is required (house) <br />• Lot 8: 4’ rear yard where 20’ is required (house) <br />(d) The requested 6.7’ rear yard setback for the house on Lot 1 is inconsistent <br />with the Planning Commission’s recommendation to remove all external <br />PD setback modifications, however, as this lot line is an existing side lot <br />line and current conditions would only require a 6’ side yard setback, it is <br />reasonable to allow a reduced rear yard setback as part of the Project. <br />Further, Lot 1 provides a larger side yard than required which will be <br />8.B. - Page 20
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.