Laserfiche WebLink
<br />9 <br /> <br />II. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES: <br />In determining whether impacts to agricultural <br />resources are significant environmental effects, lead <br />agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land <br />Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared <br />by the California Department of Conservation as an <br />optional model to use in assessing impacts on <br />agriculture and farmland. <br />Would the project: <br />Potentially <br />Significant <br />Impact <br />Less Than <br />Significant <br />With <br />Mitigation <br />Incorporated <br />Less Than <br />Significant <br />Impact <br />No <br />Impact <br />e) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or <br />Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as <br />shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland <br />Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California <br />Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? <br />    <br />f) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a <br />Williamson Act contract? <br />    <br />g) Involve other changes in the existing environment <br />which, due to their location or nature, could result in <br />conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? <br />    <br />h) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest <br />land to non-forest use? <br />    <br />i) Involve other changes in the existing environment <br />which, due to their location or nature, could result in <br />conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or <br />conversion of forest land to non-forest use? <br />    <br /> <br />Documentation: <br />The LII area does not contain any agricultural uses or forest land. The project would not convert, conflict with, or change any <br />agricultural uses or contracts. The proposed changes would not result in a loss or conversion of forest land. <br />8.C. - Page 22