My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2015-09-21 Joint Special SAF PAF
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
AgdaPkt 2015-09-21 Joint Special SAF PAF
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/22/2015 12:12:16 PM
Creation date
9/18/2015 8:41:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
9/21/2015
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
756
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />11 <br />IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES – <br />Would the project: <br />Potentially <br />Significant <br />Impact <br />Less Than <br />Significant <br />With <br />Mitigation <br />Incorporated <br />Less Than <br />Significant <br />Impact <br />No <br />Impact <br />b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat <br />or other sensitive natural community identified in local or <br />regional plans, policies, and regulations or by the <br />California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish <br />and Wildlife Service? <br /> <br />c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected <br />wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water <br />Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, <br />coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological <br />interruption, or other means? <br /> <br />d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native <br />resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with <br />established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, <br />or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? <br /> <br />e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting <br />biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or <br />ordinance? <br /> <br />f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat <br />Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation <br />Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat <br />conservation plan? <br /> <br /> <br />Documentation: <br />The project makes no changes to landscaping standards, habitat protection, or any other type of biological resource, including <br />tree preservation. The proposed changes to the LII area would not produce conditions which would interfere with wildlife <br />movement, corridors, or nursery sites. The LII zoning district is located in an urbanized, historically light industrial sector of <br />Redwood City. The scope and purpose of the LII zoning district does not regulate habitat protection or biological resource <br />preservation. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />V. CULTURAL RESOURCES – <br />Would the project: <br />Potentially <br />Significant <br />Impact <br />Less Than <br />Significant <br />With <br />Mitigation <br />Incorporated <br />Less Than <br />Significant <br />Impact <br />No <br />Impact <br />a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance <br />of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5? <br /> <br />b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance <br />8.C. - Page 24
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.