My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2015-09-28 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
AgdaPkt 2015-09-28 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/29/2015 10:44:35 AM
Creation date
9/24/2015 7:14:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
9/28/2015
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
210
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ii. The City Followed CEQA with Respect to Determining Whether an EIR <br />Is Required for the Project, including Pursuant to (1) CEQA Guidelines <br />Section 15168, (2) CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15163, and <br />(3) CEQA Guidelines Section 15183. <br /> <br />After a city approves an EIR for a comprehensive land use plan like the DTPP, the city <br />shall consider whether further environmental review is required with respect to <br />subsequent discretionary decisions on particular projects that implement the underlying <br />plan. Whether a supplemental EIR or other environmental document must be prepared <br />depends upon the analysis of the subsequent activity in light of the existing EIR. <br /> <br />The City performed this analysis, which ultimately shows that further environmental <br />review is not required. <br /> <br />Three sets of interrelated provisions of the CEQA Guidelines demonstrates why the <br />Project does not require further environmental review. <br /> <br />First, CEQA Guidelines section 15168(c) provides that if the City has already prepared <br />an EIR for a comprehensive land use plan such as the DTPP, unless the subsequent <br />activities would create new significant impacts or require new mitigation measures, as <br />analyzed under CEQA Guidelines section 15162, the City may find that the Project is <br />within the scope of the EIR. <br /> <br />Second, CEQA Guidelines sections 15162 and 15163 provide that the City shall not <br />prepare another EIR unless the City determines, on the basis of substantial evidence, <br />that certain conditions exist that will lead to a new significant impact or substantial <br />increase in the severity of a previously identified impact, or that a new or previously <br />rejected mitigation measure or alternative would substantially reduce significant effects. <br /> <br />Third, CEQA Guidelines section 15183 provides that if the City has prepared an EIR for <br />a zoning plan (like the DTPP), the City shall not prepare another EIR “except as may be <br />necessary to examine whether there are project-specific significant impacts which are <br />peculiar to the project or its siteU.” <br /> <br />The City followed these three sets of provisions. The City prepared a written checklist <br />(i.e., the Initial Study) to evaluate the site-specific Project in light of the DTPP EIR. The <br />City analyzed whether the Project would create new significant impacts or substantial <br />increases in the severity of previously identified significant impacts, or whether a new <br />mitigation measure or alternative would substantially reduce significant effects. No such <br />impacts were identified. Nor is any new mitigation measure or alternative required to <br />substantially reduce any significant impact. Thus, an additional EIR is not required. <br />7.A. - Page 20
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.