Laserfiche WebLink
ATTY/DOCS-STAFF REPORTS/DRAFTS/MASSAGE ORD STAFF REPORT (RS CLEAN) 9-21-15 <br />REV: 09-17-15 RS <br />Page 1 of 4 <br />REPORT <br />To the Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />From the City Manager <br /> <br />September 28, 2015 <br /> <br />SUBJECT <br />Ordinance Repealing and Replacing Chapter 18A (Massage Services) of the Code of <br />the City of Redwood City Relating to the Regulation of Massage Businesses <br /> <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />Waive first reading and introduce an ordinance repealing Chapter 18A and adopting a <br />new Chapter 18A (Massage Services) of the Code of the City of Redwood City relating <br />to the regulation of massage businesses. <br /> <br />BACKGROUND <br />Prior to 2009, individual municipalities, not the State of California, were responsible for <br />regulating massage businesses and massage professionals. In 2009, the State <br />Legislature passed the California Massage Therapy Law or Senate Bill 731. This <br />legislation established the California Massage Therapy Council (CAMTC), a nonprofit <br />entity charged with issuing voluntary permits to all massage therapists in the state. The <br />law also significantly limited cities’ regulatory authority over massage businesses. In <br />2011, Redwood City amended its massage ordinance to comply with SB 731 and to <br />require all massage practitioners working in Redwood City to obtain a certificate from <br />the CMTC. <br /> <br />In 2014, the state legislature enacted AB 1147, returning authority to cities and counties <br />to regulate the massage industry. Under AB 1147, cities and counties have increased <br />authority to regulate the massage industry. The new legislation allows the CMTC to <br />continue to certify massage practitioners while empowering local governments to <br />exercise land use control and impose operating standards and permit, licensing and <br />certification requirements on massage businesses. However, cities are prohibited from <br />imposing certification requirements on individual massage therapists unless they own <br />the massage business. <br /> <br />Following the passage of AB 1147, the County of San Mateo proposed that all cities in <br />San Mateo County regulate massage businesses via a model ordinance drafted to <br />coordinate with the County’s massage ordinance. The expectation is that the adoption <br />of a uniform County-wide program governing massage establishments will deter the <br />operation of illegal massage businesses within the County. The County reports that its <br />ordinance has been effective in removing illegal massage establishments, and that <br />there currently are none operating in unincorporated areas of the County. <br />6.4.A. - Page 1