My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2015-09-28 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
AgdaPkt 2015-09-28 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/29/2015 10:44:35 AM
Creation date
9/24/2015 7:14:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
9/28/2015
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
210
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The block on which the Project site is located contains two resources to be preserved: <br />611 Middlefield Road and 620 Jefferson Avenue. The block also contains one resource <br />that may be altered, relocated or removed: 605 Middlefield Road. The Project site is <br />directly adjacent to 611 Middlefield and 620 Jefferson, and is across the intersection <br />from the historic courthouse (also identified as a “Resource to be Preserved”.) The <br />Project site itself does not contain any historic resources. <br /> <br />Appellants contend that this constitutes a cluster of historic resources which the Project <br />will negatively impact (including with respect to renovations at 620 Jefferson Avenue, for <br />which the City had been supportive), and therefore that the Project is inconsistent with <br />the DTPP’s historic resource preservation regulations. <br /> <br />The regulations and evidence are to the contrary. <br /> <br />In crafting the DTPP, the City identified areas with strong clusters of historic resources <br />where adjacent, non-historic sites would be subject to development restrictions in order <br />to “minimize visual impacts on historic buildings as much as possible and to preserve <br />the historic urban feel of the area within a framework of new development.” (DTPP, <br />p. 156.) Examples of such areas where clusters of historic resources are located <br />include Broadway and Main Street. In those areas, non-historic properties near historic <br />properties are subject to further development restrictions. Relative to those areas, the <br />North of Marshall District has few historic resources. As noted above, the entire city <br />block on which the Project site is located contains two historic resources to be <br />preserved, one which may be altered, relocated or removed, and seven parcels which <br />do not contain any historic resources. Further, this city block is not identified in the <br />DTPP as part of an existing historic district, nor is it adjacent to an existing historic <br />district. <br /> <br />Analysis of the Historic Resources regulations further demonstrates that the Project <br />does not conflict with any historic resource standards or guidelines. As with all other <br />sections of Book 2, the Historic Resources regulations are compiled into mandatory <br />standards and recommended guidelines. Each identified historic resource in the Plan <br />area has its own standards and guidelines that regulate modifications, if any, that can <br />be made to that individual resource. As an example, the standards for the historic <br />courthouse mandate that “any addition must be located completely behind the historic <br />1910 structure” and “no addition may exceed the height of the Broadway façade’s <br />cornice.” (DTPP, p. 34.) As to the historic resource at 620 Jefferson Avenue, the DTPP <br />lists four standards, including that “no additional structure on this property may exceed <br />the height of the historic structure by more than 1 story.” (DTPP, p. 38.) <br /> <br />7.A. - Page 9
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.