My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2015-09-28 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
AgdaPkt 2015-09-28 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/29/2015 10:44:35 AM
Creation date
9/24/2015 7:14:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
9/28/2015
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
210
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Accordingly, the Project is consistent with all historic resource provisions of the DTPP, <br />including those applicable to (1) historic resources and (2) non-historic sites near <br />historic resources. <br /> <br />ii. The Project Complies with Height and Architectural Style Regulations. <br /> <br />Appellants’ Contention: The City has not considered height reductions to preserve <br />historic resources and preserve the character of City streets and should apply the four- <br />story stepdown requirement, even though it does not actually apply in this 12-story <br />zone, because the Project is adjacent to historic resources. (See, e.g., Carr Appeal, <br />pp. 3-4; Keyes Appeal, pp. 3-4.) <br /> <br />City’s Response: As discussed in the Planning Commission staff report and other <br />sections of this report, the subject site is in a 12-story height zone. When the City <br />adopted the original DTPP, maximum permitted building heights were similar to the <br />current DTPP, but did not include any step-downs near historic resources or key public <br />open spaces. (DTPP, p. 17.) When the City Council adopted the 2011 DTPP, it <br />imposed a targeted 3-story limit within precise areas of downtown. First, the frontages <br />of the lots immediately to the east and west of the historic courthouse, along Hamilton <br />Street and Middlefield Road, have 3-story limits, as do the frontages along Broadway <br />and Main Street. (DTPP, p. 86.) Second, the frontage of 621 Middlefield Road, one of <br />Applicant’s parcels which is adjacent to the historic resource at 611 Middlefield Road, <br />has a 3-story limit along its frontage. Thus, the DTPP has already mitigated impacts to <br />the adjacent, and in fact all historic resources by limiting the heights of certain parcels to <br />three stories, in order to avoid impacts. <br /> <br />In addition, the City has taken action to reduce the Project from its original 11 story/136’ <br />proposal. Throughout the City’s review and public hearing process, input by staff, <br />Advisory Committees and the public influenced the Applicant to reduce the project by <br />two stories and 24’ (below the height of the historic courthouse dome.) The Planning <br />Commission’s approval of the 9 story/112’ Project reflects those efforts. <br /> <br />The DTPP recognizes that the North of Marshall District (which includes the subject <br />site) includes an eclectic mix of office, government and other buildings that reflect a <br />range of historic and contemporary designs. (DTPP, pp. 9.) Indeed, the DTPP allows <br />large office buildings and further urbanization in this North of Marshall neighborhood. <br />(DTPP, pp. 17, 22.) The DTPP actually anticipates that buildings up to 12 stories high <br />in this zone will have a range of styles (e.g., neoclassical structures like the Project) and <br />will be adjacent to historic structures, such as the three historic resources at issue here. <br /> <br />7.A. - Page 11
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.