Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Chapter III - Circulation, Transportation & Capital Improvements <br /> B. Balancing Land Use - Land uses that have complementary peak ommendations to significantly reduce traffic and congestion in <br /> trip characteristics are encouraged. Complementary land uses the area. Maximizing ridership for existin~ employer-sponsored <br /> should be configured to relate to one another to create mixed- shuttles, and expanding SamTrans bus service should be the fo- <br /> use places that encourage pedestrian circulation and discourage cus of transit-related efforts. Transit linkages between the east <br /> auto circulation. For example, hotel, office, and residential uses and west sides of Redwood Creek to Downtown and the Caltrain <br /> may be located above first floor commercial spaces; residential station are essential. <br /> and office uses may share a common street and/or public space. <br /> Workplace and residential development have opposite in/out New development in the Precise Plan Area should be required <br /> traffic peaks. Hotels and certain retail commercial businesses to provide for shuttle service to downtown Redwood City, the <br /> generate most of their traffic on evenings and weekends when Caltrain station, and other possible key locations such as BART, <br /> other uses generate less. the County Center, Kaiser, and EI Camino Real. Shuttle sched- <br /> ules should be coordinated for residents and employees to maxi- <br /> A demand analysis for commercial services and public facilities mize the efficiency of the system; i.e., the shuttle should have <br /> may be required in conjunction with proposals for new residen- short headways during peak commute periods and at other times <br /> tial and workplace development. To the maximum extent fea- operate periodically or on an on-demand basis. <br /> sible, supporting commercial facilities and public facilities should <br /> be provided within the Precise Plan Area; e.g., in-lieu payments As part of TOM efforts, businesses and homeowners associa- <br /> to provide facilities in other locations may exacerbate access tions should offer transit passes (e.g., multi-agency "Eco" -passes) <br /> problems and are generally not recommended. Development to residents and employees. <br /> agreements and/or other mechanisms should be used to ensure <br /> that supporting commercial space and public facilities are pro- R Transportation Demand Management (TOM) Plan - TDM mea- <br /> vided. sures are intended to enhance Redwood City's quality of life <br /> while accommodating growth and investment. They provide a <br /> C Supportive Street Design - The Precise Plan Area is a 5-10 minute framework for the mitigation and monitoring of traffic impacts, <br /> walk from end to end, supporting pedestrian and bicycle circu- and emphasize increasing non-automobile alternatives for cir- <br /> lation and transit use. Public and private streets should be de- culation within the greater Bayfront area. TOM measures are <br /> signed to encourage transit, pedestrian, and bicycle movement. specifically focused to reduce the need for future auto capacity- <br /> Key public and private streets should be designed to accommo- related road widenings. <br /> date the turning movements associated with shuttles and buses. <br /> Streets should be designed to encourage bicycle and pedestrian Appendix B contains a listing of TOM measures that incorporate <br /> circulation, with street trees, lighting, paved areas/routes, and those recommended by the Mari1Ul Shores Village Draft ElK These <br /> other features that make streets attractive public places in their measures are based on the EIR "project," and shall apply accord- <br /> own right. ingly to future Precise Plan Area development of the same or <br /> comparable land use type and quantity, subject to City review. <br /> O. Shuttle and Bus Service - Enhanced transit service is needed for A number of these measures are included in this Chapter's poli- <br /> the Precise Plan's land use, parking supply, and other TDM rec- cies and/or the Precise Plan's development standards. The City <br /> Final Plan - June 2004 - 70 - <br />