Ord04 2264 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Chapter IV - Implementation ments that are intended to reduce traffic generation by a minimum 3. A Parking Use Study of all parking lots and structures specified of 15% from typical Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) trip genera- by the City Traffic Engineer. The traffic consultant will count tion rates, based on analyses conducted for the Marina Shores Village how many parking spaces are occupied and vacant at selected Project EIR. The Precise Plan circulation improvements and traffic intervals during the study period. shall be monitored to ensure that trip-reducing efforts are under- taken and are sufficient to meet Precise Plan objectives. If this analysis indicates that the traffic from the previous phase(s) of development is greater than 85% of Institute of Traffic Engineers The developer shall fund TDM measures, and a permanent means of (ITE) trip generation rates for the developed land use types, the funding and maintaining TDM efforts shall be established. This developer shall implement one of the following program options: includes funding a TDM coordinator through the City, contract with another agency, or contract with an appropriate transportation plan- t Design and implement a program, subject to City approval, in- ning consultant. cluding but not limited to a more aggressive TDM Program that will bring the trip generation/traffic impacts to the 85% level; or Developers seeking Planned Community (PC) Permits within the Precise Plan Area shall, prior to any development, pay for the cre- 2. Reduce subsequent amounts of development to bring traffic into ation of a traffic datum baseline study that shall include: conformance with the 85% standard defined above. The Plan- ning Commission will review and recommend to City Council - Collection of data on the number of residents, employees, and an amendment to the Precise Plan, as appropriate. visitors visiting existing buildings and counts of cars going into and out of parking lots and garages (human and vehicular trips). 3. Some mix of the prior two approaches may be recommended by the Traffic Engineer and either approved by the Planning Com- At the submittal of each subsequent PC Permit for each phase of mission as part of a subsequent PC Permit, or recommended by development within the Precise Plan Area, a traffic consultant will the Planning Commission to the City Council as an amendment be hired by the City and paid for by the developer. The application to this Precise Plan. for such subsequent PC Permits shall be deemed incomplete unless accompanied by the traffic analysis described following. The traffic At each subsequent PC Permit submittal the required traffic and park- consultant will collect data on the operation of the previous phases ing analysis shall review all previous development by the devel- of development approved by the previous PC Permit(s), including oper. Where such PC Permit submittals are amendments of previ- but not limited to: ously approved PC Permits that do not add further square footage or intensify the uses on the site, the Planning Director may waive 1. Resident, employee, and visitor counts during the most recent this requirement. In no event shall traffic inputs exceed those antici- 12-month period following occupation at a minimum of 90% of pated in previous CEQA-related analyses and the related mitiga- residential units and 80% of commercial square footage. tion measures incorporated in the Precise Plan. As part of PC Permit review, the Planning Director may also determine that additional 2. Trip counts of all trips to and from the site (daily and peak hour CEQA-related analysis is required if traffic exceeds the 85% thresh- trips ). old. Final Plan - June 2004 - 82 -