Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Council Members directed staff not to create any detours or street closures on Jefferson <br /> between mid-October and January (in other words, not during the holidays.) I <br /> I I <br /> MINUTE ORDER NO. 95-056 <br /> 2. WHIPPLE A VENUE GRADE SEPARATION <br /> Project Engineer Lee advised that the Whipple Avenue grade separation was a much <br /> larger project, $23.8 million, and was still in the beginning stages. A preliminary study <br /> had been done, funding secured, and a consultant team had been selected to start the <br /> process for public participation in this project. The Task Force will revisit the <br /> justification of this proposed grade separation and represent the viewpoints of every <br /> interest in Redwood City. <br /> Council Members discussed their concerns about the magnitude of this grade <br /> separation, and told staff they were pleased with the staffs cautious and inclusive <br /> approach to this huge project and its reliance on the community for direction. <br /> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <br /> 5. PUBLIC COMMENT <br /> Vice Mayor Hartnett invited public comment. <br /> Nita Spangler, 970 Edgewood Road, member of the Oak Knoll/Edgewood Park Neighborhood <br /> Association, invited staff to address her homeowners' association, Saturday, March 11, 1995, <br /> 10:30 A.M., in the Library, to discuss the traffic impacts on their neighborhood. Mrs. Spangler <br /> also addressed the issue of a divider along EI Camino Real from the San Carlos City line to <br /> Whipple Avenue. <br /> John Holt, 42 Iris Street, asked about traffic diversion during the Whipple Grade Separation <br /> Project and why and where would the shoofly be situated? City Engineer Luck described some <br /> alternatives and advised that those issues would be addressed by the Task Force working with <br /> staff. <br /> Michael Bursak, member of the Whipple Task Force, advised that it was stressed at the last <br /> Task Force meeting that it was not a foregone conclusion that this project would proceed; $1.1 <br /> million will be spent on a feasibility study; and not until that study is concluded would a <br /> decision be made. Also, there was a good feeling among the Task Force members that the <br /> community outreach efforts would be wide ranging and very productive. <br /> MINUTE BOOK NO. 53 <br /> Page No. 090 Special Council Meeting Minutes <br /> March 6, 1995 <br /> Page 6 <br />