My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2002-04-22
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2002
>
AgdaPkt 2002-04-22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2005 2:52:23 PM
Creation date
4/18/2002 8:50:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Agency Type
City Council
Date
4/22/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
153
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
L gislative Bill Action <br /> <br />taken on AB 1839. but they did not alleviate our tic'ns onthe ~lexibili~ to expend State Transporta- <br />concerns with this bill. AB 1839 limits the condi- tion Improvement Program (STIP) monies on <br />tions under which a design professional would be rehabilitation pro~ects for local streets and roads. <br />required to indemnify a public agency to negligence This flexibility is critical. The projected revenue <br />and willful misconduct, which is the normal tort rule, stream under Proposition 42 is not nearly enough to <br />and hence provides for no indemnification, AB 1839 declare victory over the local maintenance and <br />further limits the indemnity of the public agency to rehabilitation problem. The League opposes placing <br />causation arising from action "in the performance of any restrictions on the current flexibility of local <br />the agreement or contract," This would allow the elected officials to expend STIP monies for rehabili- <br />design professional an additional loophole with tation. Staff: Natasha Fooman, Status: AsTrans;Hrg- <br />which to avoid indemnifying and defending a public 4/15, Position:Oppose. <br />agency, by stating that a particular action was not <br />"in the performance of the contract." We believe AB 2521 (La Suer). Traffic-Actuated Signals. <br />that existing statutory requirements agreed upon by Bicycles: Motorcycles, The League removed our <br />local government and design professionals in opposition to AB 2521 baselJ on amendments taken <br />Chapter 722, Statutes of 1997 (AB 994) are suffi- by the author to alleviate our concerns. AB 2521 <br />cient protection for both local agencies and the requires that upon the first placement or replace- <br />design professional. Staff: Natasha Fooman, Status: ment of a traffic-actuated signal, that it shall be <br />AsmFIr, Position: Oppose. installed and maintained so as to detect lawful <br /> bicycle and motorcycle traffic on the roadway, to the <br /> AB 2031 (Canciamilla). Vehicles Funeral Proces- extent feasible and in conformance with professional <br />sions. AB 2031 requires local authorities in counties traffic engineering practices. With the amendments, <br />with a population greater than 100,000 people, cities and counties will not be required to comply <br />whenever the regulation of traffic is authorized for a with this requirement until Caltrans, in consultation <br />funeral procession, to regulate formal training of, with local governments, has established uniform <br />and issue to each funeral escort an identification standards, specifications and guidelines for the <br />card and an official insignia patch indicating the placement of bicycle detectors and related signal <br />funeral escort is authorized to direct traffic in timing. Staff: Natasha Fooman, Status: AsTrans;Hrg- <br />accordance with the movement of the funeral proces- 4/15, Position: Neutral. <br />sion. AB 2031 raises concerns regarding dual- <br />.jurisdiction processions. When a mortuary is in one SB 1666 (McPherson). Public Contracts. SB 1666 <br />city and the gravesite in another, would each.juris- enacts the "California First" Procurement Act which <br />diction the procession moves through be required to requires that California-based business bidders have <br />issue a separate identification card and badge to precedence over non-California based business <br />funeral escorts? Would funeral escorts be required bidders in the application of any bidder preference <br />to complete formal training in each jurisdiction? If for which non-California based business bidders may <br />cities are expected to take on a new training and be eligible. We are very concerned about the defini- <br />licensing role, we need additional state funds. Staff: tions in this bill, and how they are to be applied. <br />Natasha Fooman, Status: AsTrans;Hrg-4/15, Position: How is a city supposed to determine during the bid <br />Oppose. process what a principle office is, whether or not <br /> officers and owners are "domiciled" in California or <br /> AB 2275 (Aanestad). Transportation. AB2275 have had a "major" office or manufacturing facility <br />failed to pass the Assembly Transportation Commit- in California continuously licensed in California for <br />tee, but was granted reconsideration and will be three years? Many cities are not in a position to <br />heard again next week. AB 2275 would place restric- administer these types of preferences. However, if <br /> <br /> Visit the League's Official Web Site--www. cacities.org PRIORITY FOCUS/PAGE 5 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.