Laserfiche WebLink
Legislative Bill Action <br /> <br />SB 1227 (Burton). State Housing Bond. SB 1227 AB 1866 (Wright). Preemption of Local Authority. <br />which places a $2.1 billion general obligation Second Units and Density Bonuses. The League, CSAC <br />housing bond measure on the November 2002 and the Planners have taken an Oppose position on <br />ballot, passed the Senate and was sent to the Gover- AB 1866. This bill: (1) Prohibits a local government <br />nor. This legislation represents a major investment from exercising any discretionary review when <br />in providing the subsidies required to build'the approving a second unit; (2) Makes a number of <br />necessary housing, but it is only a beginning. An alterations, to density bonus law, including limiting <br />ongoing investment of this magnitude is required affordability covenants for housing built within a <br />just to attempt to keep pace with population growth, common interest development to 10 years; (3) <br />let alone remedy existing deficits in affordable Provides that the interests of a developer in securing <br />housing. Staff: Dan Carrigg, Status: On the a density bonus overrides all other local policies and <br />Governor's Desk, Position: Request for Signature. laws, and (4) Establishes a legal process where <br /> developers are favored to prevail when they sue <br /> AB 2292 (Dutra). Preemption of Local Authority local governments. <br />and Property Rights. The League, the California State <br />Association of Counties, and the American Planning After arguments were made in opposition to this <br />Association have joined together in opposition to AB bill on April 10, this bill was put over by the commit- <br />2292. This bill: (1) Prohibits a city or county from tee until a .later date while potential amendments are <br />reducing the residential density for any parcel below discussed to mitigate some of the concerns with this <br />the density that was utilized in determining compli- bill. However, be advised--many members of this <br />ance with the jurisdiction's housing element by committee appear poised to pass this legislation <br />administrative, adjudicative, or legislative action or with only minor modifications. Those local govern- <br />by a vote of its electorate, unless the city, county, or ments that want to preserve discretion over second <br />city and county makes written findings supported by unit approvals, and are concerned about the lan- <br />substantial evidence that the reduction is consistent guage in the density bonus provisions which permit <br />with the adopted general plan, including the hous- a developer's demand for a density bonus to trump <br />ing element, and other provisions of law relating to all other local ordinances and policies, should <br />density and incentives for developers to build lower contact their legislators immediately. Staff: Dan <br />income housing; (2) Declares that this requirement Carrigg, Status: AsHou&ComDev/AsLG, Position: <br />shall be in addition to any other law that may . Oppose. <br />restrict or limit the reduction of residential density; <br />and (3) Requires that if a court finds that an action AB 2875 (Vargas). Military Base Retention. AB <br />of a city, county, or city and county is in violation of 2875 authorizes the Trade and Commerce Agency to <br />this bill, the court shall award the plaintiff reason- approve a five-year extension of a local military base <br />able attorney fees and costs of suit. recovery area designation pursuant to criteria and <br /> procedures that the agency would be required to <br /> AB 2292 removes both discretion and authority develop and adc~t by regulations. The initial <br /> from the lOcal government, restricts the freedom of a designation of these areas, which are limited to <br /> property owner to obtain a desired down-zoning or eight years by statute, are due to expire this year. <br /> rezoning of their property from a local government, The League supports the availability of continued <br /> and provides an incentive for litigation by requiring incentives to assist in the economic reuse of closed <br /> local governments, and their tax payers, to pay the military facilities. The recovery of a community from <br /> attorneys fees of those who sue them. Staff: Dan a base closure, and effo~s to clean up environmental <br /> Carrigg, Status: AsJud, Position: Oppose. conditions, attract private investment, and redevelop <br /> the land, is a process that can take several decades <br /> <br /> Visit the League's Official Web Site--www. cacities.org PRIORITY FOCUS/PAGE 7 <br /> <br /> <br />