My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2015-10-26 Study and Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
AgdaPkt 2015-10-26 Study and Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/17/2015 10:03:49 AM
Creation date
10/22/2015 7:26:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
10/26/2015
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
401
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7.A. - Page 9 <br /> 2. Consider a different fee amount, which would require an additional Council hearing <br /> date. <br /> 3. Request more information and an additional Council hearing date. <br /> FISCAL IMPACT <br /> Based on recent development levels, the City could receive over $3,000,000 in <br /> affordable housing impact fees per year. These amounts would likely vary widely <br /> depending on the timing of particular applications, use of alternative housing plans, and <br /> economic cycles. Staff recommends revisiting the fee in two years to assess outcomes <br /> and potentially modify the fee. <br /> There would be staff costs with collecting and administering the fee. The CDBG/HOME <br /> Administrator and staff would be the primary contact for this program. In consultation <br /> with the Planning Division, the program administrator would meet with developers and <br /> collect the fees. The City Council would direct how funds are spent. Staff is <br /> recommending as Exhibit D of the ordinance that an initial deposit of $1,500 be required <br /> to pay for staff time in collecting and administering the fee. <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW <br /> The adoption of the ordinances and resolutions is not a project under the California <br /> Environmental Quality Act as they create a governmental funding mechanism that does <br /> not involve any commitment to a specific project that may result in a potentially <br /> significant effect on the environment. (CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(b) (4)). <br /> Furthermore, even if these approvals were a project, they would be exempt from CEQA <br /> because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the fees may have a <br /> significant effect on the environment, in that the ordinance and resolution contain no <br /> provisions modifying the physical design, development, or construction of residences or <br /> nonresidential structures (CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3)). <br /> DIANA O'DELL <br /> PRINCIPAL PLANNER <br /> AARON J.AKNIN <br /> ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.