My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2016-01-25 Closed and Interview and Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
AgdaPkt 2016-01-25 Closed and Interview and Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2016 10:03:08 AM
Creation date
1/21/2016 6:15:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
1/25/2016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
522
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The SMC Office of Sustainability established an Advisory Committee in early 2015, on <br />which Vice Mayor Ian Bain has served as a member and the City’s Public Works <br />Services Director, as an alternate. When neither was available, other City staff attended <br />the committee meetings. In September 2015, SMC released its draft technical feasibility <br />study on CCA, which estimates GHG reductions and costs for three levels of renewable <br />power. The technical study can be found at the CCA program’s website: <br />http://www.peninsulacleanenergy.com/resources/technical-study/. SMC’s CCA program <br />is now named Peninsula Clean Energy (PCE). <br />ANALYSIS <br />PCE’s draft technical study assesses the benefits and liabilities of forming a CCA in San <br />Mateo County. The study examines three hypothetical scenarios (portfolios of 35-42%, <br />50-65% and 100% renewable power) and calculates the rates and GHG emissions <br />under each scenario. These hypotheticals are meant to assess the feasibility of PCE <br />under a range of conditions; however, the portfolio products ultimately offered by PCE <br />will be determined by the JPA. The study estimates that the first scenario would be 5% <br />lower in cost but would also result in higher GHG emissions than PG&E. The second <br />option would be slightly lower in cost (3%) but result in lower GHG emissions than <br />PG&E. The third option would be slightly more expensive (2%) but would provide <br />substantial GHG emission reductions as compared to the current PG&E portfolio. The <br />study also includes a cost benefit analysis, a sensitivity analysis to show the range of <br />rates for each of three electricity supply scenarios, and a risk analysis. <br /> <br />Benefits <br />The benefits of PCE include: <br />· providing greater consumer choice about the environmental attributes of their <br />electricity supply, <br />· introducing competition into the energy marketplace to help lower costs for <br />consumers, <br />· potential for reducing communitywide GHG emissions, and <br />· establishing local control over energy procurement, rate-setting, and programs <br /> <br />PCE offers consumers a choice between service providers where there currently is <br />none. Businesses and residents could opt out of the program and stay with PG&E or opt <br />in and choose from among the portfolio options offered by PCE. Consumers may be <br />able to choose between multiple power options, each with a different percentage of <br />renewable energy. <br /> <br />SMC forecasts that the JPA will choose to provide a default option that is price <br />competitive with PG&E’s current rates but with a higher percentage of renewable <br />7.A - Page 2
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.