My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2016-02-22 Closed and Interview and Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
AgdaPkt 2016-02-22 Closed and Interview and Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2016 8:19:52 AM
Creation date
2/18/2016 3:58:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
2/22/2016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
307
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of Redwood City, Public Works Division Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration <br />Document Date: October 15, 2015 <br />Revision Date: January 25, 2016 Page 52 Blankinship & Associates, Inc. <br /> <br />3.16 Transportation/Traffic <br /> <br /> Potentially <br />Significant <br />Impact <br />Potentially <br />Significant <br />Unless <br />Mitigation <br />Incorporated <br />Less Than <br />Significant <br />Impact <br />No Impact <br /> <br />Would the Project: <br /> <br />a) Cause an increase in traffic which is <br />substantial in relation to the existing <br />traffic load and capacity of the street <br />system (i.e., result in a substantial <br />increase in either the number of vehicle <br />trips, the volume to capacity ratio on <br />roads, or congestion at intersections)? <br /> <br /> <br />b) Exceed, either individually or <br />cumulatively, a level of service standard <br />established by the county congestion <br />management agency for designated <br />roads or highways? <br /> <br /> <br />c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, <br />including either an increase in traffic <br />levels or a change in location that result <br />in substantial safety risks? <br /> <br /> <br />d) Substantially increase hazards due to a <br />design feature (e.g., sharp curves or <br />dangerous intersections) or incompatible <br />uses (e.g., farm equipment)? <br /> <br /> <br />e) Result in inadequate emergency access? <br /> <br />f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? <br /> <br />g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or <br />programs supporting alternative <br />transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle <br />racks)? <br /> <br /> <br />Discussion <br /> <br />Items a) & b): No Impact. The Project involves the use of light duty trucks that will not cause an <br />increase in traffic that is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the <br />county roads in the Project area. Generally, activity related to the Project is limited to one or <br />two vehicles at any given time. <br /> <br />Item c): No Impact. The Project has no influence on air traffic. <br /> <br />6.3.A. - Page 60
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.