My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2016-02-22 Closed and Interview and Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
AgdaPkt 2016-02-22 Closed and Interview and Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2016 8:19:52 AM
Creation date
2/18/2016 3:58:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
2/22/2016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
307
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of Redwood City, Public Works Division Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration <br />Document Date: October 15, 2015 <br />Revision Date: January 25, 2016 Page 54 Blankinship & Associates, Inc. <br /> <br />3.17 Utilities and Service Systems <br /> <br /> Potentially <br />Significant <br />Impact <br />Potentially <br />Significant <br />Unless <br />Mitigation <br />Incorporated <br />Less Than <br />Significant <br />Impact <br />No Impact <br /> <br />Would the Project: <br /> <br />a) Exceed wastewater treatment <br />requirements of the applicable Regional <br />Water Quality Control Board? <br /> <br /> <br />b) Require or result in the construction of <br />new water or wastewater treatment <br />facilities or expansion of existing <br />facilities, the construction of which could <br />cause significant environmental effects? <br /> <br /> <br />c) Require or result in the construction of <br />new storm water drainage facilities or <br />expansion of existing facilities, the <br />construction of which could cause <br />significant environmental effects? <br /> <br /> <br />d) Have sufficient water supplies available <br />to serve the project from existing <br />entitlements and resources, or are new <br />or expanded entitlements needed? <br /> <br /> <br />e) Result in a determination by the <br />wastewater treatment provider which <br />serves or may serve the project that it <br />has adequate capacity to serve the <br />project’s projected demand in addition to <br />the provider’s existing commitments? <br /> <br /> <br />f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient <br />permitted capacity to accommodate the <br />project’s solid waste disposal needs? <br /> <br /> <br />g) Comply with federal, state, and local <br />statutes and regulations related to solid <br />waste? <br /> <br /> <br />Discussion <br /> <br />Items a) & b), and e) through g): No Impact. The Project will not discharge to a wastewater <br />treatment plant and does not generate any solid waste. All containers used to store and <br />transport aquatic herbicides are typically returned to the vendor for reuse. <br /> <br />6.3.A. - Page 62
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.