Laserfiche WebLink
APPENDICES <br />City of Redwood City, Public Works Division Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration <br /> <br /> 10 Blankinship & Associates, Inc. <br /> <br />Toxicity Reference Values and Risk <br />For contaminants frequently considered in ecological risk assessments, regulatory agencies, such as <br />USEPA, have developed Toxicity Reference Values (TRVs) for each contaminant. However, <br />published TRVs generally do not exist for pesticides. Therefore, pesticide-specific TRVs were derived <br />as part of this document (USEPA 1999). Endpoints from studies available from the published <br />literature or government reports and databases can be used to establish TRVs. The endpoints used to <br />estimate risk of copper to the longfin smelt were found in the published literature. As applications of <br />copper-containing algaecides and/or aquatic herbicides are sufficiently intermittent, and copper is not <br />significantly persistent within the water column, only acute exposures were considered. As such, acute <br />TRVs are derived for purposes of risk estimation. <br /> <br />The USEPA (2004) suggests applying a 20X safety factor to acute median toxicity values (LC50s and <br />LD50s) for aquatic threatened or endangered species when deriving TRVs from literature studies. In <br />this analysis, a safety factor was applied to the endpoint used as a TRV for the longfin smelt. <br /> <br />Once a TRV has been derived, it may be compared to an exposure estimate to evaluate whether an <br />adverse effect for a given species is likely to occur. Exposure was estimated assuming the copper <br />containing algaecides and herbicides are applied at the maximum label-allowable rate of 1 mg/L <br />metallic copper, equivalent to 1 part per million (ppm) metallic copper. <br /> <br />Risk is estimated by comparing the estimated environmental concentration (EEC) an organism may be <br />exposed to with the derived TRV to calculate a risk. Risk is present when the EEC divided by the <br />TRV is greater than or equal to 1.0. If an estimated exposure is lower than the derived TRV, the <br />resultant risk value is less than 1.0, and the scenario is not considered to pose a risk. <br /> <br />Risk = EEC/TRV <br /> <br />Where: <br />EEC = Estimated Environmental Concentration <br />TRV = derived Toxicity Reference Value <br /> <br />Copper <br />Since no adequate published TRVs for copper were available for saltwater fish species with similar <br />life history to the longfin smelt, the most sensitive and applicable fish endpoint from studies available <br />in the literature was selected. Studies indicate that although early life stages generally are most <br />sensitive, size, rather than developmental stage, may be the more significant factor when evaluating <br />interspecies differences in copper toxicity (Grosell et al., 2007). Thus, similarity in size between the <br />test organism and longfin smelt was an important consideration in the selection of an endpoint for <br />TRV derivation. Additionally, test conditions, such as salinity and duration of exposure, were also <br />considered in the selection process. <br /> <br />The USEPA ECOTOX Database was reviewed for appropriate studies (USEPA, 2004). Literature <br />reviewed included numerous saltwater fish acute toxicity studies including Grosell et al. (2007), <br />Burton and Fisher (1990), Krishnani et al. (2003), Mohapatra and Rengarajan (1997), Dung et al. <br />(2005), Torres et al. (1987), and Sappington et al. (2001). Given the breadth of studies available, very <br />few were done with test organisms of similar life stages and size to longfin smelt. The results of <br />Mohapatra and Rengarajan (1997) were selected for derivation of the acute TRV for longfin smelt as <br />the test organisms used (Liza parsia) were of similar size and life stage. This selection approach was <br />taken consistent with the findings of Grosell et al. (2007). See the review below for details on the <br />Mohapatra and Rengararajan (1997) study and endpoint selected for TRV derivation: <br />6.3.A. - Page 79