My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2016-02-22 Closed and Interview and Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
AgdaPkt 2016-02-22 Closed and Interview and Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2016 8:19:52 AM
Creation date
2/18/2016 3:58:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
2/22/2016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
307
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of Redwood City, Public Works Division Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration <br />Document Date: October 15, 2015 <br />Revision Date: January 25, 2016 Page 12 Blankinship & Associates, Inc. <br /> <br /> 3.0 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS <br />3.1 Aesthetics <br /> <br /> <br />Potentially <br />Significant <br />Impact <br />Potentially <br />Significant <br />Unless <br />Mitigation <br />Incorporated <br />Less Than <br />Significant <br />Impact No Impact <br /> <br />Would the Project: <br /> <br />a) Have a substantial adverse effect <br />on a scenic vista? <br /> <br />b) Substantially damage scenic <br />resources, including, but not <br />limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, <br />and historic buildings within a state <br />scenic highway? <br /> <br /> <br />c) Substantially degrade the existing <br />visual character or quality of the <br />site and its surrounding? <br /> <br /> <br />d) Create a new source of substantial <br />light or glare which would <br />adversely affect day or nighttime <br />views in the area? <br /> <br /> <br />Discussion <br /> <br />Items a) & b): No Impact. There are no designated scenic vistas, state scenic highways, or scenic <br />resources in the vicinity of the Project sites, therefore no impact would occur. The visual <br />quality of the Lagoon, which is considered an important aesthetic site, would not be <br />negatively impacted by Project activities. To the contrary, the Project would enhance the <br />visual quality of the Lagoon by clearing nuisance algae and weeds. <br /> <br />Item c): No Impact. The Project involves the short-term or seasonal application of aquatic <br />herbicides that contain copper to the Lagoon to control a variety of algae and/or aquatic <br />vegetation. These algae or aquatic weeds are typically at or below the water surface. Upon <br />control, the removal of these weeds would be unnoticed and would not degrade the visual <br />character of the Project site. <br /> <br />Item d): No Impact. The Project is done during the daylight hours, therefore no light sources are <br />needed and no light or glare is produced. <br />6.3.A. - Page 20
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.