My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2016-02-22 Closed and Interview and Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
AgdaPkt 2016-02-22 Closed and Interview and Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2016 8:19:52 AM
Creation date
2/18/2016 3:58:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
2/22/2016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
307
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City of Redwood City, Public Works Division Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration <br />Document Date: October 15, 2015 <br />Revision Date: January 25, 2016 Page 29 Blankinship & Associates, Inc. <br /> <br />estimate risk of copper to the longfin smelt were found in the published literature. As <br />copper applications are sufficiently intermittent and copper is not significantly persistent <br />within the water column, only acute TRVs are derived. <br /> <br />The U.S. EPA (2004) suggests applying a 20X safety factor to acute median toxicity <br />values (LC50s and LD50s) for aquatic threatened or endangered species and a 10X safety <br />factor for terrestrial threatened or endangered species. Often, no herbicide-specific <br />toxicity results are available for various taxonomic groups. For example, database and <br />literature searches for copper toxicity testing of saltwater fish species did not yield any <br />useable studies. In this case, fish toxicity endpoints of a species with similar size and life <br />history to the longfin smelt were used. <br /> <br />Once a TRV has been derived, it may be compared to an exposure estimate to evaluate <br />whether an adverse effect for a given species is likely to occur. Exposure was estimated <br />assuming the copper containing algaecides and herbicides are applied at the maximum <br />allowable label rate of 1 ppm metallic copper, equivalent to 1 mg/L metallic copper. If an <br />estimated exposure is lower than the derived TRV, the exposure scenario is not <br />considered to pose a risk. <br /> <br />Risk is estimated by comparing the estimated environmental concentration (EEC) an <br />organism may be exposed to the derived TRV to estimate a risk. Risk may be present <br />when the EEC divided by the TRV is greater than or equal to 1.0. Risk is likely not present <br />if the result is less than 1.0. <br /> <br />Risk = EEC/TRV <br /> <br />Where: <br />EEC = Estimated Environmental Concentration <br />TRV = derived Toxicity Reference Value <br /> <br />Copper Discussion <br /> <br />Copper toxicity is largely driven by its environmental concentration. However, water quality <br />parameters such as pH, hardness, alkalinity, salinity, and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) <br />affect the bioavailability of copper. These parameters affect the competitive binding of copper <br />to other molecules in the water column, thereby altering the fraction of copper that is <br />bioavailable to elicit toxic effects. <br /> <br />The USEPA suggests the use of the Biotic Ligand Model to analyze and/or predict toxicity of <br />bioavailable copper in freshwater systems. The free cupric ion (Cu2+) is the primary driver of <br />copper bioavailability and toxicity in aquatic ecosystems (USEPA 2007). Because the <br />Redwood Shores Lagoon is not a freshwater system, this model was not appropriate and <br />therefore not used. Instead, the highly conservative assumption was made that 100% of the <br />copper present in the water column is bioavailable. <br /> <br />Since no adequate published TRVs for copper were available for fish, the approach used here <br />was to select the most sensitive and applicable fish endpoint from studies available in the <br />literature. Studies indicate that, although early life stages generally are most sensitive, size <br />rather than developmental stage may be the more significant factor when evaluating <br />6.3.A. - Page 37
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.