Laserfiche WebLink
Perspectives on Helping Low-Income <br />Californians Afford Housing <br />MAC TAYLOR • LEGISLATIVE ANALYST • FEBRUARY 9, 2016 <br />Summary <br />California has a serious housing shortage. California’s housing costs, consequently, have been rising rapidly <br />for decades. These high housing costs make it difficult for many Californians to find housing that is affordable <br />and that meets their needs, forcing them to make serious trade-offs in order to live in California. <br />In our March 2015 report, California’s High Housing Costs: Causes and Consequences, we outlined the <br />evidence for California’s housing shortage and discussed its major ramifications. We also suggested that the <br />key remedy to California’s housing challenges is a substantial increase in private home building in the state’s <br />coastal urban communities. An expansion of California’s housing supply would offer widespread benefits to <br />Californians, as well as those who wish to live in California but cannot afford to do so. <br />Some fear, however, that these benefits would not extend to low-income Californians. Because most new <br />construction is targeted at higher-income households, it is often assumed that new construction does not <br />increase the supply of lower-end housing. In addition, some worry that construction of market-rate housing <br />in low-income neighborhoods leads to displacement of low-income households. In response, some have <br />questioned whether efforts to increase private housing development are prudent. These observers suggest that <br />policy makers instead focus on expanding government programs that aim to help low-income Californians <br />afford housing. <br />In this follow up to California’s High Housing Costs, we offer additional evidence that facilitating more <br />private housing development in the state’s coastal urban communities would help make housing more <br />affordable for low-income Californians. Existing affordable housing programs assist only a small proportion of <br />low-income Californians. Most low-income Californians receive little or no assistance. Expanding affordable <br />housing programs to help these households likely would be extremely challenging and prohibitively expensive. <br />It may be best to focus these programs on Californians with more specialized housing needs—such as homeless <br />individuals and families or persons with significant physical and mental health challenges. <br />Encouraging additional private housing construction can help the many low-income Californians who <br />do not receive assistance. Considerable evidence suggests that construction of market-rate housing reduces <br />housing costs for low-income households and, consequently, helps to mitigate displacement in many cases. <br />Bringing about more private home building, however, would be no easy task, requiring state and local policy <br />makers to confront very challenging issues and taking many years to come to fruition. Despite these difficulties, <br />these efforts could provide significant widespread benefits: lower housing costs for millions of Californians. <br />8.A - Page 9