My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2016-04-25 Closed and Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
AgdaPkt 2016-04-25 Closed and Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/27/2016 10:48:55 AM
Creation date
4/22/2016 3:39:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
4/25/2016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
596
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
2 Environments 7.B. - Page 65 <br /> inventory of the proposed APE did not locate any surface indications of archaeological resources. <br /> None of the known shell mound sites are located in or adjacent to the project alignment, and no <br /> Native American prehistoric sites villages, contemporary or traditional uses, sites, or trails have been <br /> identified within or in the vicinity of the proposed project location. No architecturally or culturally <br /> important structures or landmarks are within or in the vicinity of the proposed project location <br /> (Basin,2013). <br /> No findings of fossils or paleontological resources have been recorded in the vicinity of the project <br /> area, according to the University of California Museum of Paleontology (UCMP) online database <br /> search conducted on June 11, 2009. The nearest paleontological site is located approximately two <br /> miles southeast of the project area near the City of Atherton (City of Redwood City,2010). In <br /> general,paleontological resources within the San Francisco Peninsula are found along the coastline of <br /> the Pacific Ocean and the within the outcropping marine units of the Santa Cruz Mountains. <br /> V. CULTURAL RESOURCES --Would Potentially Less Than Less Than No <br /> the project: Significant Significant Significant Impact <br /> Impact with Impact <br /> Mitigation <br /> Incorporation <br /> a) Cause a substantial adverse change in ❑ ® ❑ ❑ <br /> the significance of a historical resource as <br /> defined in Section 15064.5? <br /> b) Cause a substantial adverse change in ❑ ® ❑ ❑ <br /> the significance of an archaeological <br /> resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? <br /> c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique ❑ ® ❑ ❑ <br /> paleontological resource or site or unique <br /> geologic feature? <br /> d) Disturb any human remains,including ❑ ® ❑ ❑ <br /> those interred outside of formal <br /> cemeteries? <br /> a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined <br /> in Section 15064.5? <br /> The Basin historical resource surveys found no significant historical resources in the project area and <br /> concluded that excavation during construction would have a low to very low potential of <br /> encountering any significant historical resources. The following mitigation measures would be <br /> 2-25 US 101 Pedestrian Undercrossing and Bair <br /> Island Road Storm Drain Pump Station Project <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.