AgdaPkt 2016-04-25 Closed and Joint SA PFA

Browse Search

7.B. - Page 80 2 Environmental Analysis d)Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? The project area does not contain any sites that are on the list of Hazardous Waste and Substance Site maintained by the DTSC,pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 (DTSC, 2102). Based on the hazardous material database searches and ESA (See Appendix F), one facility adjacent to the project area, at 350 Convention Way,was reported to have LUSTs; the facility site-clean up has been completed,and the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) closed the case as of February 6, 2001 (SWRCB,2013). The proposed project would not involve any activities on the parcels identified as hazardous material-listed sites. No federal National Priority-listed (NPL) sites are within a 3.0-mile radius of the project area. One active Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) site (Duolite International) is approximately one mile southeast of the project area. Three Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) hazardous waste sites are within a 3.0- mile radius of the project area;the closest is 1.3 miles to the northeast. At these distances, the materials at these sites would not affect the proposed construction activities. (No Impact) f)For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? The proposed project would be approximately 1.5 miles from the San Carlos Airport and would be consistent with the areas of influence established by the City and County Association of Governments of San Mateo County (C/CAG). The ground-level facilities would not result in a hazard to navigable airspace at the airport, according to the criteria in the Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) Part 77, Objects Affecting Navigable Airspace. There are no other private airstrips in the vicinity of the project area. There would be no impacts to airport safety. (No Impact) g)Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? The proposed project would not interfere with any emergency response and evaluation plans. The proposed construction activities would occur underneath the US 101 bridge or on lands owned by the City, outside designed roadways. All major roads and evacuation routes would be accessible during construction. The City would design the proposed joint-use path to be capable of accommodating passage of a light duty emergency vehicle should access be needed in the event an emergency. (Less than Significant Impact) 2-40 US 101 Pedestrian Undercrossing and Bair Island Road Storm Drain Pump Station Project